This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

Canfor Corporation
10/23/2020
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Canfor and Canfor Pulp third quarter analyst call. Recording and transcript of the call will be available on Canfor's website. During this call, Canfor and Canfor Pulp's chief financial officer will be referring to a slide presentation that is available in the investor relations section of the company's website. Also, the companies would like to point out that this call will include forward-looking statements, so please refer to the press releases for the associated risks of such statements. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Don Kane, Canfor and Canfor Pulps Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, Mr. Kane.
Thanks, Operator, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining the Canfor and Canfor Pulp Q3 2020 results conference call. I'll make a few comments before I turn things over to Alan Nicol, our Executive Vice President of Canfor Pulp Operations and Chief Financial Officer of Canfor Corporation, as well as Canfor Pulp. Alan will provide a more detailed overview of our performance in Q3. In addition to Alan and I, we are joined by Kevin Pankratz, our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. I would like to start by recognizing the exceptional efforts of our employees to ensure a safe work environment in the midst of a global pandemic. Their dedication, their resilience, and their hard work has been very impressive, particularly in view of the challenges people are no doubt facing with the uncertainty and stress of the pandemic on everyone's lives. The financial results we experienced in Q3 were not what anyone had expected, particularly during the early days of the pandemic. Our industry has become more disciplined, more responsive, and more dynamic, and we are well prepared and able to operate efficiently and effectively in this changing and new environment. We do believe that several of the trends we've seen emerging during the pandemic are going to be sustainable and will continue to positively impact our industry. Pre-pandemic, for many people, their home was primarily for shelter, for sleeping and eating. Now the home is becoming an office, a school, an entertainment area and a recreation space in addition to sleeping and eating. People want their homes to be comfortable and are able to accommodate all of these additional activities. We see evidence of this in the strong R&R and DIY demand and believe it will continue to evolve and increase in importance. We're also seeing a shift from urban living to suburban and rural living as people buy more spacious single-family homes and have greater flexibility to work from home. The strong housing starts are being supported by the low mortgage rates and desire to own a single family or multi-family low or mid-rise home and increasing trends from urban high-rise condo living to less dense housing and we see this worldwide. In addition, the age of homes has also increased significantly and have now reached levels not seen since World War II. We were encouraged by the recent US housing data, which was led by strong demand for single-family homes, which represented over 78% of the total housing starts in September. Additionally, both single-family starts and building permits reached highs not seen since 2007. Turning to our markets, our lumber business generated record high adjusted operating income of $387 million and record revenues of $1.3 billion. Record lumber prices, disciplined cost management, strong productivity, and a return to more normalized operating rates contributed to our lumber segment results. Lumber prices increased rapidly as the quarter progressed, driven by unprecedented demand in the repair and remodel and treated lumber segments in North America and Europe, strong US housing starts, and low field inventories throughout the supply chain worldwide. Demand from offshore markets was relatively stable during the quarter, however, they have not achieved price levels seen in North America due to the typical lag in pricing these markets typically face. Our outlook for the remainder of 2020 is a continuation of strong markets, although we anticipate lumber prices will correct as they currently are through the fourth quarter due to typical seasonal demand reductions during this period. During the third quarter, Beta completed its acquisition of three sawmills from Bergs Timber, This acquisition further improves our global diversification with approximately 22% of our production capacity now located in Europe. We continue to be very pleased with our acquisition as well as the ester operation in South Carolina. As of today, we have approximately 44% of our production in British Columbia, 4% in Alberta, 22% in Europe, and 30% in the United States. Results in our pulp business reflect the impact of extensive fiber-related production downtime combined with weak global pulp markets stemming from the ongoing impact of COVID-19. Following extensive sawmill curtailments early in the second quarter, Canfor Pulp took a four-week curtailment at the Intercon and PG Pulp Mills during the third quarter, in addition to scheduled maintenance downtime at Northwood and Taylor. As you will have seen in our news releases, we have made the decision to replace the lower furnace for RB5 at Northwood, which Alan will discuss further in his comments. Global softwood pulp demand is anticipated to improve slightly through the fourth quarter as markets continue to recover slowly from the economic impact of COVID-19 and elevated inventory levels following the seasonally slower summer months. I would also like to highlight that our 2019 sustainability report was released in September. We are regularly revisiting our corporate strategy and reassessing our sustainability and ESG reporting processes to ensure we are aligned with the best-in-class standards. Sustainability and ESG are a top priority for the executive team, and to demonstrate its importance, Pat Elliott's role has been expanded to Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance and Sustainability. In addition, this quarter, we filled the newly created position of Director of Environment and Sustainability, which is responsible for the development and advancement of our comprehensive sustainability strategy. As we look forward to 2021, we will continue to focus on improving our balance sheet, deploying capital internally that targets rapid payback and high return projects, and consider external acquisitions that will improve our global diversification. I will now turn it over to Alan to provide an overview of our financial results.
Thank you, Don, and good morning, everyone. The Canfor and Canfor quarterly results were released yesterday afternoon and come together with our overview slide presentation in the investor relations section of the respective companies' websites. In my comments this morning, I'll briefly speak to quarterly financial highlights, a brief summary of which is included in our overview slide presentation. Our lumber segment reported operating income of $337 million for the third quarter, compared to $107 million for the previous quarter. After adjusting for a net duty expense of $51 million, the lumber segment generated operating income of $387 million, up $327 million from the previous quarter. A record high lumber business results reflected an unprecedented increase in North American lumber pricing as the quarter progressed with a significant surge in demand outpacing available supply following widespread industry containment earlier in the year. As a result, unit sales realizations in North America saw substantial increases in the quarter. In Europe, unit sales realizations benefited from stronger demand, a favorable geographic sales mix, as well as a 5% weaker Canadian dollar. With most business in Europe based on pricing negotiated quarterly in advance, European prices are projected to show solid increases through the fourth quarter of 2020. Notwithstanding seasonal downtime at the company's European lumber operations, overall lumber unit manufacturing costs benefited from stable log costs and a 36% increase in production through the quarter, with substantially all mills operating at full capacity following the COVID-19 related production curtailments taken in the earlier part of the second quarter. In addition, lumber production reflected Vita's September 1st acquisition of Berg's Timber. Our pulp business reported an operating loss of $28 million in the third quarter, compared to an operating loss of $6 million reported for the previous quarter. Results for the current quarter reflected weak global pulp market conditions, significant fiber-related downtime, as well as a previously deferred scheduled maintenance outage at Northwood. These factors being related to the ongoing impact of COVID-19. Pulp production was down 13% in the quarter, largely reflecting a four-week curtailment at the Indercon and PG pulp mills, as well as the scheduled maintenance downtime at Northwood and Taylor's annual maintenance as well. Pulp unit manufacturing costs were moderately higher than the previous quarter, principally reflecting the aforementioned lower production. During Northwood's scheduled outage, the mill's recovery boiler number one was found to be in stable condition and maintenance was completed in one production line in early October. Regarding Northwood's recovery boiler number five, previously announced capital upgrades to the upper furnace are progressing well. Early this week, management made the decision to extend the outage on RB5 to enable the replacement of the lower furnace at an estimated cost of $30 million. This work will be undertaken in the fourth quarter, and this is anticipated to result in approximately 60,000 to 70,000 tons of reduced pulp. In conjunction with the upper furnace project, this lower furnace upgrade will ensure that RB5's continued operation for another 15 to 20 years. In light of the assessments made by management with regards to RB1 and RB5, the previously considered option of a super recovery boiler at an estimated cost of $400 million will now not be required. At the end of the third quarter, Canfor, excluding Canfor Pulp, had net debt of $506 million with available liquidity of approximately $1 billion. After taking account of FIDA's acquisition of Bergs, liquidity improved by approximately $345 million during the quarter, reflecting significant cash earnings combined with favorable working capital movements. As of September 30th, Canfor had paid cumulative cash duty deposits of approximately $550 million and is currently anticipating a material reduction of approximately 15% in the company's cash duty deposit rate towards the end of the fourth quarter. upon finalization of the rates of the first period of review. Canfor pulp ended the third quarter with net debt of $19 million and available liquidity of approximately $130 million. Excluding capitalized major maintenance, we currently anticipate 2020 capital spending of approximately $125 million in the lumber segment and approximately $75 million for Canfor pulp, including the RB5 work currently being undertaken. With regard to 2021, we are currently anticipating capital spending of approximately $200 million for lumber and approximately $60 million for pulp.
And with that, Don, I'll turn the call back to you. All right. Thanks, Alan. So operator will now take questions from analysts.
Thank you. We'll now take questions from financial analysts. If you have a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please lift your receiver and then press star 1. If at any time you wish to cancel your question, please press star 2. Again, please press star 1. Now, if you have a question, there will be a brief pause while participants register for questions. Thank you for your patience and one moment for your first question. Okay, so the first question is from Sean Stewart from TD Securities. Sean, please go ahead.
Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, Sean. Good morning. A couple of questions. First, for Don or Kevin, a little more context on the current lumber price correction we're seeing in North America. And I guess specifically, you mentioned some seasonal elements to it. But can you speak to which end markets you've seen some relative weakness or I guess at least a deceleration in growth over the last five weeks or so? For sure, Sean.
Maybe, Kevin, why don't you give Sean an update on that? I know you're doing a lot of work around that. Sure.
Good morning, Sean. Yeah, I mean, the price decline that we've seen was pretty much anticipated and largely due with seasonality. We are off some of the peak demand items like in the R&R segment. which were pretty significant that we saw in the summer and in June months. So we have seen a little bit reduced demand there. And then quite frankly, the inventories have gradually started to rebuild into the system, but are still quite lean. And so we're just in that balance that we're seeing right now.
Okay, thanks for that detail. And then a question on Europe specifically. probably flies under the radar a little bit, but we were impressed by the margin expansion this quarter. Price realizations were up a little bit. And first part of the question is how much of that is attributable to moving incremental volume into North America? And then we saw an apparent reduction in unit costs this quarter. Any details you can give us with respect to factors that contributed to that trend as well?
I guess, first of all, on the market or on the mill nets, like you've talked about there a bit, Sean, I mean, yeah, they were up for sure, not to the degree that you would have expected or not expected, but we've seen in North America for sure, just because, and I know you're aware of this, but in terms of the lag that we see typically in Europe, but some of the real benefits of some of the increases that we're seeing in North America, but also in Europe as well, to a similar extent, actually, we'll see a lot more inflation there on on market prices here as we go into Q4 because the business is always lagging for sure. And then on the cost side, even with the reduction in production in July due to the fact that Sweden would take three weeks of downtime there roughly, we took an extra week this year. I think we took in some mills at least four weeks instead of three, which is unusual, but at the time we thought that was prudent just based on where things were going. But clearly, as you look forward into August and September, they made some terrific progress there for sure on conversion costs and overall costs along the way. Alan, is there anything you want to add to that?
Yeah, no, good points, Don. I think the only other thing I would add, Sean, is that the other business units that are part of feeder were operating kind of at lower rates during the period. So that was another factor that would explain the lower unit costs.
Thanks for that, Alan. I'll get back into you. Thanks very much, guys.
Your next question comes from Hamir Patel from CIBC Capital. Hamir, please go ahead. Hi, good morning.
Don, I saw some slides from, I think, a presentation you may have done earlier in the month talking about markets. And I noticed you kind of highlighted a potential to redefine the North American pricing model. So I was just wondering if you could speak more to what you think the opportunity there is to maybe move away from, um, you know, the sort of random lens week to week pricing with at least some of your, your customers.
Yeah. Kevin has been doing a ton of work on that, but just a real high level. I mean, we, we see this as a real opportunity. If you look at what's going on in Europe for a long time, and we've always been watching that. And it's one of the, you know, one of the reasons of many that we were interested in Europe moving forward, but we're all, you also see in Asia too is more sustainable, more predictable. more pricing that was being kind of counted on for the future at profitable levels. And so we've been interested in that for a long time, is how can we stabilize earnings and how can we get away as much as we can from formula pricing based on random links or random links itself. And so Kevin and his guys, and he'll give you some detail on that for sure, because he's got some examples, but clearly we see that as a big opportunity. I think what's really maybe accelerated some of our customers' views on moving to that type of Model 2 in North America, which has been encouraging, is they're looking at their procurement policy, procurement strategies themselves, And they're now, for the first time in some cases, starting to recognize that, you know, honestly, if you really look at it as we look forward here, we need to improve some of the communication and partnerships that we have with our suppliers and more be focused on stabilized pricing and demand and supply themselves as well. So we're seeing a lot more cooperation. Kevin, that we've ever seen, right? I mean, give maybe Hamir a little bit of detail of what you're working on.
Yeah, totally. Hamir, like, during this huge run-up that we saw in Q3, the conversation was less about price and more about availability, just because they did not have the wood to complete jobs and projects So we definitely saw a change in behavior with certain segments. Like I can speak to like the trust guys, the MSR, like where they want to lock into more longer monthly or longer type pricing arrangements. We've done a bit of that. We've done business with other segments via treated. Even our European, Swedish volume coming into the US, we've entered into some longer term agreements. It's a bit of a newer concept for some of the folks But it's definitely more a part of the conversation than it was, say, two years ago. So it's just some small examples of what we're seeing.
There's no doubt that some of the key segments that we deal with were pretty bad here with lack of supply during the critical period here. And what we spent, you know, Kevin and our marketing group spent a ton of effort here to try to do all we could do to make sure our key strategic customers were in stock as best we could handle through that period. But that's really, like I said at the start, have really accelerated how they're rethinking about their procurement policy.
Thanks, Don and Kevin. That's really helpful. And, Don, so maybe for next year, do you have a sense then as to maybe what percent of your maybe North American volumes might have shifted or are going to shift to maybe more of a longer-term pricing terms?
I mean, why don't you give an order of magnitude there? We're just in the early stages on that. Are you talking about the longer-term pricing, Hamir? Yes, yeah. You know, it probably could be into that 15% to 20% range as a start.
Okay, great. No, thanks. That's very helpful. And just a final question for me. Don, I was curious to get your thoughts on, you know, if we see a new administration in the U.S. next year that maybe wants to make the WTO work, what do you think that could mean for the software lumber dispute?
Yeah, you know, good question. I think, Amir, like our view now, and I've talked to a lot of, you know, stakeholders in the U.S. side about that, too, and, you know, where we kind of are and where we think we might be going here. But I I think personally, I think that we're a ways away here from any kind of resolution, no matter what is running in the background here. I think there's so much at this stage, particularly with COVID and the concerns around that, with some of the geopolitical issues that we're all aware of worldwide and so forth. that our view and certainly the US coalition's view is that this is a couple of years away from any kind of resolution probably at this stage. Now, that could change, but certainly it's not on the radar screen of the key coalition guys from certainly that I've heard. And of course, we ourselves as an industry in Canada have had a few false starts over the last two or three years. And we typically get into a situation where we seem to be negotiating with ourselves, and we're not prepared to do that anymore. I mean, we think we're in a good position. We know that we're even more. We've always been 100% confident that we're solid here, even more so now. And so we, you know, like I said, we think it's going to be a couple of years away. There's no incentive. There's nothing being done right now, I guess, bottom line.
Fair enough. Thanks, Don. That's all I had. I'll turn it over.
Your next question comes from Paul Quinn from RBC Capital Markets. Paul, please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks very much, Warren. Pretty familiar with the lag in lumber prices on the way up in North America, and I suspect Q4 should be pretty good for you even with prices coming down, but just want to try to understand what do you expect in Asia? The commentary says, you know, expecting higher pricing, but it's not going to be anywhere near sort of the rise that we saw from Q2 to Q3, right?
For sure.
Kevin, why don't you talk to us? Sure. Yeah, Paul, so maybe I'll just break on Asia just a little bit there first. So China, I would expect, we have already seen some modest price increases there throughout the month because we fell on a monthly basis. to bi-monthly basis over there. And our indications are that we'll see some modest price increases, nowhere near what we saw in the US and still a ways to go. But I think the more material increases, what we saw was in Japan. It was quite significant. And we expect that trend to potentially continue into Q1.
Okay, great. And then just looking at your net debt, I mean, you've got a little bit over $300 million here. You know, my model is sort of predicting debt-free by mid-21 here, given our forecast. What is our priority for capital allocation at this point?
Yeah, I think, you know, for sure, Paul, I mean, for starters, I mean, we've been a good few months here and got us in a pretty solid position, as you mentioned there, compared to what we certainly expected going into this year and even towards the end of the first quarter. But it's turned out a lot more positive. But, you know, we always have in the back of our minds where we were six months ago, too. But regardless, our number one priority will continue to be, as it's always been, is to make sure that the existing mills that we have are capitalized to the extent they need to be to keep up the level of efficiency that we think we need to have in all the areas that we operate at so that we know what we're going to be, at least from that point of view, be competitive. First starters, number one. Number two will be organic capital. And we've had a fairly aggressive organic capital plan the last several years here in the south. And that's still underway and still moving along well. So we'll continue to look next at additional organic opportunities. And there are some, there's one or two that we're looking at in Sweden, of course, and there's one or two high return projects that we're looking at as well, potentially here in the US. And no doubt there'll probably be one or two also in British Columbia. So that's second, really. And then that last one, of course, is M&A opportunities. And I think on that, I would just say that we're getting lots of interest. There's lots of folks that typically in these good markets, you get a lot of the ones that poor operators that are willing, would like to sell and capitalize on it. And that's good. We're not interested, of course. Or else there are very high multiples on them as well at this time. So right now, we're looking, of course, we will continue to keep our eyes out, particularly in Europe and in the U.S. South. But at this stage, there's nothing pending. And certainly, if there's an opportunity to rise, we'll look at them. But right now, we're going to continue to improve our balance sheet and really be focused hard on discipline around that. and see how the early part of next year, how that looks and what the trends are starting to look like going forward.
Okay, and then maybe just to follow up on that, you own a little bit over 50% of Camp 4 pulp. Does that go against the Camp 4 sort of diversification strategy if you were to acquire any more of that?
No, not really. I mean, from our standpoint, and I mean, you guys are probably tired of hearing me say the same thing, but I'll say it again anyway. I mean, the ownership that we have in Canberra Pulp, we like that diversification that we have with the pulp business. It's linked in pretty good for our business, for sure. And we also like kind of the ownership position that we're in currently, and we have no plans to change that. And at this stage, anyway, we're currently happy with the way that's structured right now.
Okay, and then just last question, the recovery boiler number five there at Northwood, that $30 million fix, that's 15 to 20-year extension. Have you got a guarantee on that, and where does that come from?
Go ahead, Alan. I think that might be overstating it, Paul. I mean, that is reflective of management's best estimates working, obviously, with a number of experts in the field, but the sense is that by doing these extensive replacements, if you will, and upgrades in the upper part of the furnace. We're really repurposing that RB5, and there's a real sense of quiet confidence here that we're going to be able to put behind some of the issues that we faced over the last couple of years.
All right. Thanks very much. Great quarter. Good luck.
Your next question comes from Mike Wild from Bank of Montreal. or sorry, Mark Wild from Bank of Montreal. Mark, please go ahead.
Thanks. Congratulations on a very good quarter. I think all of this has really caught all of us off guard. Don, to start out, I wonder just going back to Paul's capital allocation question, you know, one of the other options would be to buy back some stock, and I'm not suggesting you go whole hog on this, but the stock is is more than 40% below where you were buying two years ago. And the implied value of the company right now is a lot lower on a per unit of capacity base than a lot of the acquisitions that you've done. So why not have an element of share repurchase in the capital allocation strategy?
Yeah, thanks, Mark, and it's a good question, and I probably should have mentioned that, too, when I did talk to Paul's question. But, I mean, you know, it's certainly something that we have on the list. It's just not a priority for us at this stage. I mean, we've always, and we're going to continue down this road, and I'll let Alan comment further maybe on some specifics, but we, you know, number one, and especially in our industry and with technology changing at the level and the rates that they are, we need to continue to make sure, first and foremost, that our mills are... competitive and efficient to the degree they need to be on a worldwide basis. Because it's even more pressure now than it used to be on that. Because everyone around the world we're competing with and they're all focused part of that. So that's the first thing. In terms of organic capital and de-risking capital that we do spend, in terms of increasing production at least in the right areas and the right products and so forth, that's clearly an area that we feel has got the least amount of risk for sure going forward. We've been pretty successful at it, so we certainly think that's a high priority and we're going to continue to do that. And then, of course, M&A, as I mentioned, too. So on the list would be that, Alan, but maybe you can give Mark a little more detail, because I know you and your group and Pat spent a fair bit of time trying to prioritize in the right order and so forth.
Yeah, no, I think Don said it well, Mark. I mean, today we're clearly seeing the benefits of diversification, and that's what Don's outline clearly kind of backs that up. And it's not just that the share buyback is off the radar screen. But clearly it is on the list, but it is something that we will revisit from time to time. I would also add that clearly, you know, if you go back six months, things have changed radically from that time. And so, so much volatility, so much uncertainty. So, we do have a more conservative stance generally. But given another few quarters, we'll clearly be looking at our options more closely, including share buyback. But it's further down the list.
Yeah, just to be clear, Alan and Don, I mean, I'm not suggesting that you go hog on this. You know, I think it's smart to continue to invest in productivity. Just when you look at the history of the industry on things like share purchases, they've often been timed really poorly. And we've got kind of a situation in the market right now where your prospects actually look pretty good to a lot of us and your shares don't reflect that. So it just seems to me there is an opportunity to put some element of your cash flow to work on the repurchase. So my two cents worth. The other thing I want to follow up on, just the boiler rebuild at Northwood. Can you just give us a little more of a sense of what went into this? Because it seems like based on the avoided capital here of that super boiler, this almost looks like a no-brainer. What else might have been involved in the equation here that we're not thinking about?
Well, yeah, I don't think there's too much that they are not thinking about, Mark. I mean, I think, you know, if you go back 18 months ago, certainly the options that we were looking at included a new, a brand new recovery boiler and replacing the two that we have there currently or repurposing the other two over time. Clearly at the time, pot market conditions were significantly more favourable as well. So that was one of the reasons that we were looking at both those options. I think it's fair to say when we've actually looked at this and we've got a new VP of pulp as well that's really been bringing some fresh perspective to this as well. We've recognized that we are better served by repurposing RB5 as I outlined and also continuing just to monitor and for regular repair, if you will, for RB5. But we're encouraged by how RB1's looking. And I think, as I said earlier, by doing what we're planning to do in RB5, we think we find a less expensive solution, but one that also provides us with the assurance around operation that we've been looking for. Clearly, we don't get all of the... Sorry, I should say, clearly, one doesn't get all of the productivity and efficiency benefits that one might get with a brand new boiler, but those are more than offset by the factors I mentioned.
Okay. Just also related to pulp, Alan, can you talk about the adequacy of fiber for the four pulp mills going forward?
No, for sure. I think we've had to take some fairly significant courses of actions, as I outlined, but we are in a very good position from a fiber perspective right now. Mark, we feel that we're well served for a good while here and certainly no issues getting through the winter and through the first part of next year. And so we'll continue to work hard to make sure that our fiber situation is positive. Clearly, we're motivated to drive our costs of whole log chips down and to find as much salt mill residual chips as we can. And clearly, we're benefiting on the ladder from the full operating rates of the salt mills as well.
Okay. And then, Don, I don't think you answered the question about VITA shipments into North America and what those were in the third quarter and what we should expect going forward. I think when you bought VITA, you talked about maybe 200 million board feet coming into the North American market from VITA going forward.
Kevin, would you give Mark the numbers there?
Yeah, I mean, we were up probably about 5% there, Mark. And then, quite frankly, I think looking at Q4, there is still significant demand and inventory shortages in Europe, such as UK and the European markets, that would be a focus. So I think we'll be somewhat stable, consistent going forward, but there definitely was an increase participating in those high demand and high price markets that we saw in Q3. But I do see, for us anyway, a little bit of maybe repatriation back, but not to a significant degree, but we were up in Q3. Okay.
And the last one for me, Don, I wondered if you might just talk a little bit about the acquisition by Bender Holtz down in Florida. You know, if you look at that company, it seems like a very innovative company. company over in Austria, does a lot of stuff, I think, also with kind of mass timber construction. So just, you know, implications of them moving into the North American market, you know, at the same time that you're moving over into the European market.
Yeah, I mean, to me, I know those guys well, and the fellow that, excuse me, the fellow that's leading that there now, he was a big part of Klausner for many, many, many years. So he And he was one of the guys that initially, just going back several years, 15 years or more even, responsible for bringing Klausner, Fritz Klausner, when he went into the North American market, into the market here. And so he's lived here. He moved from Austria, moved into North America, and has lived here for 10 or 15 years now. So he's well aware of the North American market. He's got good contacts in North America and so forth. So it didn't, you know, to me, if you're that particular company and there's an opportunity there, the guy that they have on the ground that they, you know, that's really their president in North America, got lots of experience in North America, rare for a European to have that. And I think, you know, he's probably the guy that convinced them to do it. And so they, you know, and really for us, it really doesn't impact us too much. I mean, I think what you're gonna see from them is much more focus on more commodity type grades there. I think we all do. The log quality in that particular area isn't a significant advantage. It's more directed to the commodity-type products. That's fine because we're not interested in that market ourselves, as you know, and we've talked about lots. We just look at it. It'll be probably a bit more commodity, 2x4 and wider on the market. We don't see it as a big issue for ourselves, either in sourcing logs and causing inflation that we don't expect, or increased competition for products that we're manufacturing already ourselves. So it's kind of a non-event, frankly. Okay. Sounds good. I'll turn it over. Thanks, guys. All right. Thanks, Mark. Good to talk to you.
We have one more question from Hamir Patel from CIBC Capital. Hamir, please go ahead.
I just had one follow-up. You disclosed the sale of the polar board OSB plant. Was that sold as still as a functioning OSB press, and is it expected to produce OSB in the future?
Yeah, I guess just on that OSB plant, it's not going to be resale. We won't see additional production of OSB from that plant in British Columbia. It'll be repurposed elsewhere, period. And when and to what extent, I have no idea at this stage what that might be out there.
Okay. Thanks, Don. That's all I had. Okay. All right. Thanks, Claire.
There are no further questions at this time. Please proceed.
All right. Thanks, Operator, and thanks, everyone, for participating. for joining the call this morning. We appreciate all your support and we look forward to talking to you early in the new year. Thank you very much.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.