Torex Gold Resources Inc.

Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Torex Gold second quarter 2026 results conference call and webcast. As a reminder, all participants are in a listen-only mode and the conference call is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star and then one using a telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may reach an operator by pressing star and zero. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Laura Toten, Manager, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. On behalf of the Torex team, welcome to our Q2 2026 conference call. Before we begin, I wish to inform listeners that a presentation accompanying today's conference call can be found under the Investors section of our website at www.torexgold.com. I would also like to note that certain statements to be made today by the management team may contain forward-looking information. As such, please refer to the detailed cautionary notes on page two of today's presentation, as well as those included in the Q2 2026 MD&A. On the call today, we have Andrew Snowden, President and CEO, and Dan Rollins, CFO. Following the presentation, Andrew and Dan will be available for the question and answer period. This conference call is being webcast and will be available for replay on our website. Last night's press release and the accompanying financial statements and MD&A are posted on our website and have been filed on CDAR+. Also note that all amounts mentioned in this call are U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated. I will now turn the call over to Andrew.

Thank you, Laura, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Forex Gold Q2 results call. First results call for me in the role as president and CEO following Jody's retirement last month. The main takeaway from the quarter is that our Morelis operation is performing to plan with production very much on track to achieve our annual production guidance. For those of you following along on the slides, I'm talking first to slide four, which summarizes our second quarter results. And this tracks expectations as we mined through planned lower grade and lower gold recovery stokes in the quarter, producing just over 96,000 ounces, putting us at around 197,000 ounces gold equivalent year to date. I expect Q2 to be the lowest production quarter of the year as we return to higher grade areas than mine in Q3 and Q4. and we are already seeing the benefits of these improved grades with production of over 43,000 ounces gold equivalent in the month of July, which is setting us up well for a good step up in production here into Q3. Falling sustaining costs of $2,459 an ounce were elevated in part due to this lower production quarter, but importantly our margins remained robust at 46%. We also continue to generate strong free cash flow of $94 million, supporting about $55 million in capital returns to shareholders during the quarter. Most importantly, we delivered yet another safe quarter with no lost time injuries for the fifth consecutive quarter, maintaining a zero lost time injury frequency rate per million hours worked for both our employees and contractors. And turning next to slide five, you can see our own sustaining costs on a year-to-date basis at $2,165 an ounce, which is elevated compared to our typical run rate due to three key factors. Firstly, the impact of the lower grades on production and sales. As I mentioned, these grades will, though, pick up and improve costs in the second half of the year. Secondly, we saw higher plant reagent costs, and that was due to both consumption rates and unit pricing. And this was required to process the lower recovery oil we were working through in the quarter and in the first half of the year. Thirdly, a stronger peso, which year-to-date has averaged about 17.5 to 1, and that compares to our original guidance of 19 to 1, and that's created a meaningful impact given about 50% of our operating costs are peso-denominated. Although production is expected to step up over the coming quarters and accordingly costs will decrease significantly, we have revised our full-year oil and sustaining cost guidance to a range of $2,000 to $2,100 an ounce. Note that these costs are based on the updated full-year guided metal prices of $4,500 an ounce gold, and that used to be $4,000 gold in our original guidance. as well as updates to our silver and copper assumptions of $72.50 silver for the year and $6 a pound copper for the year which are more reflective of the metal prices we've seen year to date. Sustaining capital guidance has also been revised upwards to $135 to $145 million and that primarily reflects the impact of the peso as well as some additional equipment leases at MediaLuna. Importantly, we're still tracking to plan for our original full-year production guidance of 420,000 to 470,000 ounces, and we'll be generating significant free cash flow through the course of the year. Operationally, Q2 was a very strong quarter, as you can see here on slide six. Mining rates at both MediaLuna and ELG continue to outperform at 7,700 tons per day at MediaLuna and nearly 3,100 tons per day at ELG. And we expect rates at each mine to stay around these levels through the remainder of the year. On the processing side, throughput in Q2 was also ahead of design at nearly 10,800 tons per day, and you can see this shown on slide six on the left-hand chart here. This is a level we expect we'll be able to continue to achieve through the remainder of the year. Copper and silver recoveries both saw meaningful improvements in Q2, and while gold recovery showed some improvements quarter over quarter, it remains slightly below the targeted 90% set out in the technical report. As noted earlier, we are expecting an improvement in recoveries through the remainder of the year, and have already begun to see better recoveries in July, where we saw about 88%. Turning next to slide eight for an update on our projects, MediaLuna North continues to progress on schedule, with first production still expected by the end of the year. A few milestones in the quarter. Notably, we broke through on the north vent adit in June, which will enable installation of our ventilation fans, which will support first ore production and mine level development. We also broke through on the one-kilometer haulage drift, which is connecting the MediaLuna North deposit into the existing MediaLuna ore handling system, another key milestone for the project. Our focus now is on expediting the procurement and construction contracts to commence construction activities in the underground line. At Los Reyes, with the compelling results of the preliminary economic assessment that we walked through on the call we had last month, with that PEA now in hand, work has commenced on the PFS, which is expected to be completed by late 2027. Drilling is also well underway with four rigs on site now actively working and the 20,000 meters of drilling planned for this year and will be focused on de-risking and upgrading the resources across the three main trends. I was down in Los Reyes myself last month visiting the team of the property and the ramp up of activities is going exceptionally well there at the Los Reyes site. On the subject of drilling, we also recently released our quarterly Morelis Drilling and Exploration Update, which is summarized on slide nine. And I'm very pleased to say that with the exceptional results we've seen to date to the east and south of Medelluna, we're accelerating the program in this area with an additional over 13,000 meters of drilling planned for this year. This is targeting to add new resources in this area with our year-end MRMR updates expected to be released in March of next year. As a result, our overall budget for exploration has increased from $77 million to a record $85 million across our portfolio of assets. This accelerated program will begin to explore the potential that the San Miguel corridor between MediaLuna and MediaLuna West may be mineralized, with the San Miguel Fault likely acting as the main source of mineralizing fluid. ELG Underground continues to return strong results that demonstrate potential both at depth and along strike of the main mineralized trends and second order structures. The program continues to support our target of replacing reserves and resources with our year-end update in March. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Dan to walk us through the financial results.

Thanks, Andrew, and good morning, everyone. Starting on slide 11, While all-in sustaining costs were elevated this quarter to the factors noted earlier on the call, margins remained robust with an all-in sustaining margin of 46%. Free cash flow of $94 million was net of $39 million in Mexican profit-sharing payments, which you recall we pay annually each May. With production and costs expected to improve through the back half of the year and period of elevated tax and profit-sharing payments now behind us, We expect to generate strong free cash flow through the second half of the year. Turning to slide 12, AISC guidance has increased to a range of $2,000 to $2,100 per ounce from a range of $1,750 to $1,850 per ounce, reflecting both internal and external cost pressures. The main drivers of the increase in AISC guidance are as follows. One, a combined $130 per ounce impact from higher plant reagent consumption and higher reagent prices, with the increase in unit pricing a reflection of increased costs for key inputs, such as ammonia in the production of sodium cyanide, a key consumable for us. Two, a $70 per ounce impact from continued FX headwinds, with guidance now assuming a Mexican peso of 17.5 to 1, versus original guidance of 19 to 1. Three, a $40 per ounce combined impact from higher mining volumes and lower gold recoveries. And four, a $30 per ounce impact from higher forecast sustaining capex, which really is a reflection of the stronger peso on underground development rates and some additional capital equipment leases. We are targeting to reduce reagent consumption rates as we utilize additional strategies to manage cyanide consumption levels within the plant. This includes the recent introduction of lead nitrate, the addition of another mock reactor, and when we begin to leverage a new GM model that our team has recently completed. If successful, we expect reagent consumption levels to improve in 2027, noting inflationary pressures related to reagent pricing and the Mexican peso may persist. Moving to slide 13. Despite the higher costs, cash flow during the quarter was robust and our cash balance increased to $169 million from $130 million, which includes $55 million of capital returned to shareholders and the $39 million in annual profit sharing payments I discussed earlier. During the second half of the year, we expect income tax installments to average around $55 million a quarter. As illustrated on slide 14, our overall liquidity position continued to improve. We exited the quarter with no debt and now have available liquidity of over $500 million. During the quarter, we also extended the term on our undrawn credit facility by one year to June 2030, which along with the $200 million accordion feature provides us with additional financial flexibility should we need it. With the highest cash outflowing quarters now behind us and production and AISC expected to strengthen, we are well positioned to generate strong free cash flow through the second half of the year which will fund our capital allocation priorities including returning $350 million of capital shareholders during the year and exiting the year with a minimum cash balance of $200 million. Turning to capital returns on slide 15. During the second quarter, we returned $55 million to shareholders, including $11 million in dividends and $44 million in share buybacks. On a year-to-date basis, we have returned $176 million of capital, representing approximately 50% of our full year target of $350 million. Before moving to the question and answer period, I wanted to reiterate that we are well positioned to deliver a strong half to the year as grades improve and gold recovery stabilize. These production factors, combined with a strong metal price backdrop, are expected to lead to robust free cash flow and strong capital returns. With that, I'll hand the call back over to the operator for the question and answer period.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To join the question queue, you may press star and then 1 on your telephone keypads. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you are using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and 2. Again, that is star and then 1 to join the question queue. We will pause for a moment as callers join the queue. Our first question today comes from Allison Carson from Desjardins. Please go ahead with your question.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, Andrew and team. Thanks for taking my questions today. My first question is on cost. Can you give us a bit more color on which one is the bigger impact to cost? Is it the peso or consumables? And if you're in the higher grade soaps now with better gold recoveries, is there a chance that the sign of consumption comes down for some cost savings outside of guidance?

Yeah, I can take that. So as we said on the call, the bigger driver really is the combined impact on consumable costs with respect to consumption rates and actual pricing. So the consumption rates are at about $100 an ounce to the AISC guidance, while the pricing added around $30 an ounce versus the peso, which is added around $70 an ounce. We are expected to still go through some lower recovery stopes here in the second half of the year, but the recoveries are expected to improve a little bit, but we are definitely seeing the higher grades. So we expect consumption rates for cyanide to be consistent with the first half, so around six and a half kilograms per tonne. But as we start to deploy some of these new initiatives and we test to see their effectiveness, we expect that as we get into better recovery stoves in 2027, we should see cyanide consumption levels decline and potentially get back to more normalized levels that we experienced through 2025. Okay, great.

That's very helpful. Oh, sorry. Go ahead, Andrew.

Alison, sorry, just to add to that as well and to reiterate some of the comments that Dan made. You know, our methodological team have been working really hard for the first half of the year here Thank you for joining us. in terms of replacing a MAC reactor in our process as well to increase oxygen pumping into the process. But we're already seeing some signs of that driving improvements in our cyanide consumption. And so although we'll see some pressure through the course of 2026 here, we are expecting to see some of that pressure being relieved into 2027 and beyond.

Okay, great. I know that's very helpful additional color there. And just my other question is almost right. I know you did touch on it, but I was just wondering, you know, you said drilling is going well. Has everything remained on track and do you still expect to get through the whole program this year with a slightly later start? And is there any chance you can sort of advance drilling a bit this year to, you know, maybe pull forward the PFS next year?

And so you're right, Alison, the drilling has commenced back in May. Everything's tracking well so far, and we're very much on track to be able to deliver the 20,000 meters that are planned through the course of this year. I think just given the timing of when we got started and given the drill started turning in May, we've got four drills currently turning. Being able to achieve anything more than 20,000 meters is probably unlikely at this stage. I think hitting our target for this year would be a good outcome. And then we'll look to continue that drilling, both from upgrading and expanding resources, as well as drilling to support our geotech and metallurgical work for the PFS. And so that will also start through this year and into next year. and support the PFS coming out kind of late next year. We're kind of thinking late Q3 into Q4. Accelerating something ahead of that is probably unlikely at this stage. We do have a number of trade-off studies that still need to be performed and we can't undertake those trade-off studies until we've got more results from the geotech and metallurgical testing that we'll be doing from the drilling that's underway at Los Reyes.

Right now, that makes sense. Well, that's it for me, and thanks for taking my questions this morning.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Cosmos Chu from CIBC. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks, Andrew and Dan. Maybe my first question is on provisional pricing. I saw that you booked a $8.7 million realized loss in Q2, but I guess my question is more with You mentioned there's no more QP hedges in place at the end of Q2. And with the silver prices up today, gold prices up today, copper prices has been up year to date. So could we, if metal prices were to stay where they are, could we see a positive provisional pricing adjustment in Q3. And can you remind me, like, how long is it between shipment and, you know, the final realized price? How long is that going to be? How long is that period between settlement now that, you know, there's no more QP hedges in place?

Yeah, thanks, Josh. So, for those that aren't aware, the provisional pricing really reflects the fact that We have a right now we have a delta about one month between when we sell the concentrate and we finally get the final price on the concentrate. So there's about a one month risk on that. Going into last year, we had a bit of a wider period where we had a spread of potentially up to three months. But with the new contracts we put in place this year, we've been able to pull that down to one month. So that's one of the reasons we're no longer doing QP hedges. We don't have that same exposure. When we do start to sell to one of the smelters later this year, we will see a bit of a longer term between when we ship and when we get final pricing. So we'll likely have some QP hedges in place there. But right now, no QP hedges. The provisional pricing really reflects that material that is unpriced or hasn't had a final price on it. That exposure is mark to mark at the end of the quarter. And as metal prices were stronger at the end of Q1, where we ended Q2, especially for gold and silver, that's what created that loss. With the return of stronger gold and silver prices here and continued strength in copper, if everything were to stay the same, we would expect to see a bit of a benefit on provisional pricing gain on the material that was outstanding at the end of June. But again, it would be minor because if everything stays flat, you would see no provisional pricing going forward on anything shipped August, September, and October because metal prices haven't changed. So short. If metal prices stay, we'd see a provisional price gain, and we'll look to use the QP hedges when we start to see pricing risk of more than a month.

Great. Thanks, Dan. And hopefully, you know, commodity prices stay, you know, keep going up. And then maybe my next question is on Media Luna North. You know, as you mentioned, production is still on track for late 2026. Andrew mentioned the vent shaft, vent raise, and also the haulage drift. Could you maybe summarize for us in terms of the key deliverables you need to target and to meet between now and year-end to get to production by the end of 2026?

Sure, and so the key things that we're working on right now to support underground development COS would be completing the ventilation system within the north vent adit. So although we've broken through and we have just received at site the ventilation fans, and so they will now be installed over the next month. And so we've got a contract crew mobilizing to be able to complete the installation of those ventilation fans. As well as now that we've got some of the main drifts and connections in place, we're also looking to install and implement the UDS system to be able to distribute paste into the plants. And so the piping and elbows and all of the equipment needed to install the UDS system is being procured. Some of it's been delivered to site already, and that will be installed here over the coming months. And so they're really the big maybe construction activities which are remaining. Otherwise, it's really just development of the mine that we've obviously been tracking well at. And now we've got at least the ventilation added open. We've got air passing through the mine, which allows us to stick to plan on first ore in late 2026. Great.

And that may be one last question. You know, there was a lot of discussion on the strengthening Mexican peso and the impact it's had on cost. I seem to remember, and I checked last night, you know, you do have some hedges, currency hedges in place. You know, there are some puts at 1850 to one, so they're kind of in the money, but I guess there's just not enough. There was only about $15 million of exposure and As of the end of the quarter, so I guess in the end, what's your strategy in terms of potentially hedging out that risk, the Mexican peso risk, and how much exposure would you need? Clearly not $15 million, but can you remind me what's your exposure in terms of Mexican peso in cost?

Yeah, so on an all-sustaining cost basis, Cosmo, about 50% of our costs are denominated in peso, and that's direct peso exposure. There has been a lot of volatility within the peso over the last few years. We've seen it from a weak point of north of 20 to during the Media Luna build where we saw it to a strength of high 16 level. So we are going to look to try to mitigate some of the exposure going forward. So you would have seen during this quarter, we've extended the period of hedging, so we've added another quarter. We'll look to have a more of a dynamic hedging process going forward where quarterly we'll look to lock in some additional pricing, more to balance out future swings in pesos versus trying to take a bet on the peso. We're just trying to minimize the swings we've experienced the last few years. I expect the peso will continue to remain strong. It's an economy that's benefiting from a lot of foreign direct investment as a lot of manufacturing starts to move back there for a bit of a nearshoring. So I think that will continue, but we'll look to mitigate that going forward. Obviously, we're not going to hedge 100% of our exposure, but we'll try to target probably up to about 60% of our peso exposure to have hedged at any one time.

Great. Thanks, Dan and Andrew, for answering all my questions. And that's all I have. Have a good weekend.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Lauren McConnell from Paradigm Capital. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning, guys, and thanks for taking my question. I was just sort of, you know, looking at that July number of 43,000 ounces, which is, you know, quite encouraging. Do you see that as a representative run rate to expect through Q3? And Did it really benefit from timing or particularly, you know, a favorable stoke sequencing or is it great or is it recoveries or is it kind of a blend of all of those? Just wanted to get some color on that and how you're seeing it through Q3 and Q4.

Yeah, thanks for the question, Lauren. And I mean, I agree, July production was definitely very encouraging and we were seeing those high grade stokes that we were expecting to hit through July. And so that's always nice to see that come through. Matt, I mean, to set expectations for Q3, I would say building in an expectation of about 115,000 ounces is a good estimate for Q3 and then a step up from that in Q4. and so August and September production are probably going to be a little bit softer than July. The grade will step down a touch and then pick up more through the course of Q4. And so I would kind of model 115 plus for Q3 and then a further step up here in Q4.

Okay, perfect. Thank you. And then just on the cost front and sort of looking out to sort of next year, If the peso stays around, you know, 17 and a half or, you know, even ends up being a bit stronger and reagent pricing remains where it is today, does, you know, sort of the new 2026 range provide a better starting point for 2027 than that original sort of 1750 to 1850? And maybe what are sort of the biggest opportunities to offset these pressures next year that you guys see? Thank you.

Yeah, on that front, so obviously the pace is one of those external factors that we can't control. So if you went with our original guidance, which was at $19 versus the new guidance at $17.50, that's added around $70 an ounce. So you could take that from our original guidance and add it. Then you have the impact of the higher metal prices that have an impact on both royalties, profit sharing, and our temporary occupation agreements. I say that's all there. The big one really is going to come down to reagent consumption. We had gone into the year looking to budget probably around two and a half to three kilograms a ton cyanide, and we're doubling that right now. That's the biggest cost driver. If we can pull that back to more reasonable levels, then I'd say that the guidance from original guidance from this year adjusted for the strength of the peso and metal price is a good place to start.

Perfect. Thank you so much, and that's all my questions for now.

Perfect. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Don DeMarco from National Bank Financial. Please go ahead with your question.

Thank you, Operator, and good morning, Andrew and team. Yeah, Andrew, thanks for the additional color on Q3 and Q4. Certainly, it sounds like you're off to a pretty strong start in July. It's encouraging. And it provides conviction on the rebound, the H2-weighted rebound, I'm just wondering, free cash flow yields are still elevated in Q2. What are the tailwinds you see in Q3 to support that? I mean, Dan, you spoke about some of the tax payments and so on. Can you just give us a refresh of some of the other non-operational costs that you see over the balance of the year?

Yeah, you'll see a bit of a step up in exploration spending because we always have a bit of a slow start to the year. So Q1 is usually the slowest period for exploration spending. Q2 picks up. And then Q3, Q4 are usually the highest. So we'll have a little bit more exploration spending in the second half, but nothing material that's going to impact free cash flow. We'll see our capex increase a little bit in the second half, especially as we get near finishing medial in the north. but all the biggest driver for improving that free cash flow yield is going to be the gold price. So just alone, if gold's now trading at 43.50 and we have now budgeted at sort of 42.50 for the year, that's a hundred bucks an ounce. And if we're doing, as Andrew said, probably between, you know, the $1.15 this quarter. That could add another $11.5 million to free cash flow, and it's there. The other risk would be continued strengthening in the Mexican peso. Again, that's a headwind that we're not able to absorb. It's been fairly stable, but right now it's trading around $17.25 versus our guidance at $17.5.

Yeah, okay.

But it sounds like the... There's no big payments. The $39 million in profit sharing that was paid, the annual true-up on the mining tax, and any leftover on the corporate income tax was paid in Q1. And as I stated on the call, you can expect to model around $55 million of income tax installments for both Q3 and Q4.

Okay, that's great caller, thanks. And then just a second and final question, you know, given the ongoing mine plan optimization ramp up media Luna, should we, you know, view the current throughput assumptions as conservative? Maybe if you just, Andrew, give us your latest thoughts on, you know, the scope to increase the throughput at the mill.

Yeah, and so, look, for the time being, Don, assuming kind of current run rates of throughput in that kind of 10,800 to 11,000 ton per day rate, I think that's a good assumption to have. You know, as we talked about in previous calls and previous meetings, we are continuing to look at opportunities to upsize that throughput and increase that throughput through two different streams. One being the deep bottlenecking stream, which we're expecting the engineering results to come out in September, but potentially could see something up to 10% improvement in overall throughput. And so something in the 11,000 ton per day range could be the output of that. You know, loosely, I would expect that benefit to come in. The earliest would probably be mid next year, but it's difficult to give you precise timing until the engineering studies are finished. And we know exactly what work is required to be bottleneck and how long the lead time is on anything we would need to procure. But that would be, I think, a reasonable estimate at this point to think about. and then we're also working through both the engineering work and the business case on what a larger plant expansion could look like that could take the plant up to 14,000 tons per day and that would obviously be a longer a longer project you should think about that being sometime in the around in the late 2028 as being Thank you. Thanks, Tom.

Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star and one. Our next question comes from Jeremy Hoy from Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks, Andrew and Dan, for taking my question. Appreciate the extra color that you've provided on the costs and the detail there. It's very helpful. One question remains from me. You've mentioned in previous press releases on exploration that regional drilling is underway currently on that Scala and El Naranjo. I remember some of those targets being pretty sizable. Can you maybe give us a preview on What you're seeing there and how you're thinking about them? Are we thinking about them as incremental increases in resources, potential step changes, or is it just too early to say? And when will we see the first results from the drilling there?

In short, Jeremy, I think it's too early to give you a whole lot of color there. We've actually just started to drill at Escala over recent weeks here, and so I expect we'll have First results there later on this year, and we can share those either end of this year or into the early part of next year, and that will provide much more information on what the opportunity looks like there. I mean, of course, the exploration team are excited. The testing and the work that we've done to date is very encouraging, and so we're looking forward to seeing the output of those drill results. And of course, as we've talked about before, that could provide us an opportunity to to think about a heat leach facility which would be separate from the processing plant opportunity that we just talked about and further growth of production within the Morelos complex. As you think about resource expansion and resource increase, the nearer-term opportunity there, Jeremy, are the points we talked about on the call, which is bringing the MediaLuna East and MediaLuna South into our resource base. And that's why we've increased our drilling investment in that region through the balance of this year. We are hopeful that we'll be in a position to be able to declare some resources within those new areas in March of next year. And so, you know, near-term resource growth will come from Medialuna East, Medialuna West. Escala will obviously take a bit more time as we undertake the drilling and be able to show what that deposit potentially could look like.

Great. Well, thank you, and we'll look forward to those updates on both Medialuna and regional. And all my other questions have been answered, so I'll step back in the queue.

Perfect. Thanks, Jeremy. Cheers.

And as there appear to be no additional questions, this will conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.