This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk02: Good morning and afternoon. My name is Sylvie, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the CLO Waste Solutions Q3 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star then number one on your telephone keypad. And if you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then number two. Thank you. and I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Ryan Jackson, Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Jasdeep Dhaliwal, Chief Financial Officer of Cielo Waste Solutions. Please go ahead.
spk09: Thanks, Sylvie, and good morning, everyone, or good afternoon, depending on where you're at. Yesterday, of course, Cielo did release its financial results for both the three and nine months ended January the 31st, 2022. We did obviously release copies of the United Interim Financial Statement and the related management discussion and analysis documents as well on all information can be found on cedar.com. This is Jasdeep's show today, so we're going to turn it straight over to her, and she'll be able to provide you with some financial highlights as well as a couple of operational tidbits as well.
spk01: Thank you, Ryan. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for today's call. Very excited to share the financial results for the period ended January 31, 2023, but also very excited to provide information Subsequent updates as of yesterday as well. So let's start with the numbers, which is the most important piece in relation to the financials. So as per our PR, our total assets at January 31st were $31 million, total liabilities $19 million, and total non-current liabilities $9.9 million. Working capital was negative $5.2 million. And the three-month ended, we had financing costs of $620K, G&A of $1.1 million, research and development, sorry, 1.1 million, my apologies, for the GNA, research and development of 442K, and share-based compensation of 143K. And as often shareholders and stakeholders have questions throughout the quarter, especially subsequent to a PR, we make note of those questions and let individuals know that we will be covering them on a public platform to ensure the risk of selective disclosure is addressed. So in my sharing of some of the significant transactions, I have incorporated some of those FAQs, we can call them. So the first question that was coming our way was distillate sales. In the past, in January, sorry, February 2022, we had completed distillate sales. And the questions from investors were, how come we're not seeing these on the financials? The reason for that is our revenue is not consistent and reoccurring because we are still a pre-production, pre-revenue company. So it sits in the financial statements in other income, other revenue line. So we did complete distillate sales, again, as PR'd in December 2022, 80,000 liters, and that is in the financial sitting in the other income and expenses line. The other item that was completed as a significant transaction was a board approved a retention strategy for key employees and for management for the CEO CFO position. Important thing to note in this retention strategy is The CEO, CFO options will not vest that were granted, do not vest until certain milestones have been met. The key milestones is preparation, engineering design, construction design for the first full-scale facility. Those are the major transactions we can speak to in the last quarter. Ongoing at this time was also the R&D facility. As previously mentioned, The R&D facility we can refer to as the micro-refinery or the scaled-down version of the full-scale Alderside facility that existed. This allowed us to improve our CapEx and really work with parameters in our input reaction output, the input being the feedstock. The reaction is how it reacts with our catalyst and other pieces. And then the output is going to be distillate, as previously disclosed by Mr. Ryan Carruthers, our EVP, The focus of the R&D facility is not to create diesel. We've established in October 2021 we can take distillate, using our desulfurization unit, produce diesel. The purpose of this R&D facility is to improve import reaction output, so to optimize it as much as possible to get the economic data. And we're starting with biomass, as previously mentioned, moving into railroad ties. So it is my pleasure to let everyone know that the R&D facility did arrive at the Alderside location. It is currently being commissioned, and we're very excited for the results. And Mr. Ryan Crothers, Brian Graham, and the rest of the team are working tirelessly to commission this facility. To Ryan Jackson and I, we just thought you plug it in, turn the lights on, but clearly there's a little bit more work to do, and we understand that. Subsequent to year end, so that was the most important piece that I'm sure everyone wanted to learn more about. The other piece which is very exciting for us from a financial or corporate standpoint is we had an opportunity to convert our loan. So we had a $4.5 million loan which was called the existing loan in the financial statements. This was converted from debt to shares with our lenders, FCF. The purpose of this is The loan was due in September 2023, so it was a current liability. There was an opportunity here to convert that into shares. The lender was willing to and interested in reinvesting that in the company through the share issuance instead of wanting a cash repayment. And for us, that was a vouch of confidence and we appreciate SCF's continuing support in that realm. The key important piece on a qualitative level here with this transaction We had a few questions on this. Where was Alderside and where was Fort Saskatchewan held for security? For Loan 1, which was referred to as the existing loan, and Loan 2, which was referred to the financials as the new loan, both of them held Fort Saskatchewan and Alderside as security. As part of doing the debt for shares conversion, Alderside was released. from loan one and loan two, and only Fort Saskatchewan is held as security for loan two. Now this ties into the next exciting piece, which is Cielo intends to sell the land for Fort Saskatchewan. This was also included in the financial statements in our MD&A disclosure that the board has approved this transaction. Further to that, ongoing has also been, our strategy has been to minimize corporate spend continue to focus on providing Mr. Ryan Crothers, Jason Gilberts, and Brian Graham the resources they need to execute on this R&D facility and ongoing testing of railroad ties. It's important to note that we do have a two-pronged approach. One approach is the R&D facility. We will be testing biomass, railroad ties, because they're both wood drives. That's considered part of one trial. Subsequent to that, the innovation line continues in Alderside, the R&D facility. What we have going at the same time is progressing on construction for the Dunmore Medicine Hat facility, which would be our first full-scale facility. Ongoing conversations are occurring with CP Rail and working through planning ahead for Alderside and for Dunmore Medicine Hat as well. As far as giving an operational update and a financial piece, that sums it up at my end. Brian, anything further at your end?
spk09: No, I think, Jasdeep, thanks for that. Just as a further mention with respect to the expected listing price for the Fort Saskatchewan property, the listing price will be $17,499,000. This price was arrived at through consultation with the listing agent that we have engaged to sell the property, and that was the number that we came to through a combination of both a cap rate calculation for an existing lease income and also the bare land that abuts the property.
spk01: I actually would also like to add one additional piece. We had disclosed in December that Crestmont Investments out of New York is working through doing due diligence. Very excited with how things are progressing on that front. So initially, the transaction was a debt placement, so a convertible debenture. where they're going to lend us funds, that would be converted to shares. Subsequently, looking at how the due diligence was progressing, this was converted into an equity investment because it is our assumption and conversations we've had that CLO has a strong future ahead of itself. We're still working through the tail end of that due diligence, but very excited for our potential partners at Cresmont. Just wanted to add that piece, Ryan, as well.
spk09: Yeah. Thanks, Jasdeep. And Sylvia, I think we're ready for Q&A.
spk02: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by 1 on your touchtone phone. You will then hear a three-tone prompt acknowledging your request. And if you would like to withdraw from the question queue, please press star followed by 2. And we ask that if you're using a speakerphone to please lift the handset before you press any keys. Please go ahead and press star 1 now if you have any questions. And your first question will be from Gary DePore.
spk08: investor please go ahead sir oh good morning uh first of all i just want to commend i guess the team of ryan ryan and jazz deep i've been a shareholder as you know for for a while now and i just want to congratulate you on restoring credibility uh slowly there's still a lot of work to go obviously but i think you guys are starting to hit milestones and and delivering on what you say you're going to deliver so i think that's that's a very positive um trend that I'm starting to see, so I just wanted to give you that as an opening comment. Also, I want to thank you for providing some additional color around the Port Saskatchewan. It would appear, so thank you, Jasdee, for confirming there's no more liens or encumbrances on Alderside, and if we are able to get the list price of around $17.4 million, whatever it is, it looks like there should be approximately $5.5 to $6 million net of additional cash proceeds after extinguishing the $11 million mortgage. So I guess my first question is, am I correct on my math on that?
spk09: Thanks, Gary. And yeah, that's exactly where we would land with respect to the equity that exists on the property if we get that kind of money for it.
spk08: Okay, excellent. Um, so Ryan, I've got a question for you, um, as the CEO, um, you know, as you know, obviously jazz deep, you know, prepares the financial statements and they have to be audited as a public company. And it's really an objective third party review of, you know, of those statements and it gives credibility obviously to the numbers, et cetera. Um, I, I guess the one piece that's sort of hanging out there, uh, and I think it, and unfortunately it's because of what's happened in the past. Um, and we're all hoping for success, obviously for, for Ryan, um, brothers and his team would you as a CEO sort of permit a third party let's say a shareholder funded third party to objectively review upon once you get your results from let's say the the railroad ties or the pen shavings or you know subsequent to come in obviously under NDA and just be able to state just like KPMG does that the process, the sort of the chemistry, the process, the results, et cetera, are credible and there's confidence to these results. So I'm looking at it almost like an audited process by a third party to objectively give more credibility to those numbers and the results that come out. Would you as CEO sanction something like that?
spk09: Thanks for the question, Gary. And of course, there's ongoing due diligence that's happening on the third-party engineering review through the Crestmont due diligence as an example. And we're certainly under the same scrutiny as it relates to going forward with any investment that we seek. I think that the one thing that I would keep in mind, and we're certainly not afraid to have any sort of third-party validation, that's why we engaged a in the due diligence with the engineering firm that Crestmont has engaged with. We're mindful of IP protection and ensuring that we do have the ability to protect that IP, so certainly not afraid to have any interested third party as it relates to some sort of a deal that would be undertaken by Cielo to complete, but we certainly would be mindful of the fact that we would have to protect that intellectual property and not have it just as a You know, we're not saying trust us. It works. We have the benefit of a number of third parties that have already reviewed including the engineering design of the skid but so I guess it's a we already are doing it and we can provide what we can in the way of that validation publicly when we
spk08: are asked for it we just have to be mindful of the intellectual property that we have and the ability to protect it no i i so ryan i i absolutely hear what you're saying and i'm not asking to um to have the secret sauce revealed by any stretch uh i was thinking more that uh somebody just like the kpmg they don't get into every single one of jazz deep's accounts uh they're going to do testing on various things and they obviously have a from a materiality standpoint so yeah We believe that the process that's been followed on the financial preparation of statements is materially correct, etc., etc. So my thought was, could you have a third party come in, review the process? I'm not asking for the secret sauce. Just say they followed good quality production, chemistry, etc. We have confidence that the results that they're sharing with the public, not with just private investors who are putting money in, are credible. I think that would help, uh, shareholders, retail shareholders and, and potentially new shareholders to the corporation, uh, you know, just have that extra degree of confidence that what you're stating is correct. And unfortunately it's because of stuff that's happened in the past. You're still living with that legacy. So that was my genesis of my question.
spk09: Yeah, no, I, we're certainly not afraid to have that validation happen. Uh, how it happens, I guess would be, but yeah, no, we're, we're, we're very confident with, uh, with, whomever it would be that would adjudicate that and wouldn't be afraid to engage with any third party that would have questions around the validation. It would just be the engagement itself and how that would be structured, as I mentioned earlier. Okay, fair enough.
spk08: That's great, Ryan. Thank you so much for answering that question. Thank you, Beth.
spk02: Next question will be from Rob Pauly at Kindle Legal. Please go ahead.
spk05: Good morning. I was just wondering if I get some background information in regards to the pickup of the R&D facility prior to getting possession of it. Was CLO there to see it running? Was there any testing done with chips or what have you just to see that it works? Just a little update in regards to what took place prior to possession.
spk09: Thanks for the question, Robin. We had, obviously, there's a chain of custody from our fabricator, RJ. down to the facility in Alderside. As Jasdeep alluded to it earlier, it's not as simple as plugging it in to see if it works before we take delivery. There's a significant multi-stage process to commissioning, and that's exactly the reason why we go through that process, which RJ is also involved with. So a number of checks and balances are done from the fabrication side, But it all comes back to the commissioning and the testing that happens once we get the control systems in place, all of the wiring that has to be done, the connections from the fluid standpoint as well, pressure checks. None of that can be done at the fabrication facility, unfortunately.
spk05: All right. Thank you for your answer.
spk09: You bet.
spk02: Thank you. As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your touchtone phone. And your next question will be from Brandon Cutler, investor. Please go ahead, sir.
spk06: Hi, good afternoon. Can you hear me?
spk09: Yep, we're good.
spk06: Oh, I just was hoping to ask about the due diligence with Crestmon. Would you say that you're very confident that it'll be completed in the near future? Just based on previous releases, I had thought the due diligence would be completed by now.
spk09: Yeah, thanks for that question, Brandon. And we are very confident with respect to the, and we're in constant communication with Crestmont. And as these things always happen, the deeper one gets into this, of course, we all want it to happen quicker than it does. But there has been nothing that we've come across that would dissuade us from thinking that there's not going to be an opportunity to close with Crestmont.
spk06: Thank you very much, Ryan. If I could just ask one follow-up question. It's just about the commissioning of the R&D facility. Am I correct that once, as part of the commissioning, the company will start to process pen shavings and biomass right away because you have that approval? And then while you're awaiting the AAP approval for testing railway ties, you'll be processing the pen shavings and the biomass in the meantime. Is that correct?
spk09: The way that we had press released it initially was to have the railroad ties and pen shavings inside the trial, but the wood biomass will be the targeted first biomass to be tested as a part of the commissioning, and that would be part of the, and it's now called the EPA, for those of you playing at home. It's Environment and Protected Areas, so I guess they wanted to sound like the United States for some reason, but it is now called the EPA. And yes, we're still waiting that approval with respect to the railroad tie trial, et cetera. But we're back and forth with them and have an open line of communication working through that process still.
spk06: Thank you very much, Ryan. Appreciate your responses. No problem, Brandon.
spk02: Next question will be from William Wong, investor. Please go ahead.
spk03: Good morning. No, my question, I'm sorry, I pushed the wrong button, was answered on the EPA approval for the rail ties. Ryan, do you have any, I guess, foresight on when that approval will happen?
spk09: You know what, William, I wish I could answer that. It's one of those things where the wheels of government turn at their own pace. So we're just simply here to make sure that whatever questions they have or any responses we get that we turn them around in a very timely manner. So the expected timeline that we had initially released was back in July when we applied. And there's been an ongoing part of the process. But yeah, it's difficult to say. It's difficult to predict. So I'm not even going to try and guess.
spk03: Okay. Thank you very much.
spk09: All right. My pleasure. Thank you.
spk02: Next question will be from Anthony George, investor. Please go ahead.
spk04: Hi, guys. Thank you for the update. My question is on two things. One, you mentioned that you will not be producing diesel, which makes sense, but the distillate, will that be saleable?
spk09: Yep. Yeah, it'll be saleable, Anthony. We're going to be producing at a smaller rate, obviously, given the size of the skid that's in the R&D facility, but there will be an ongoing amount of production that we will have the ability to sell.
spk04: Oh, okay. And a follow-up to that, is the test run for the biomass, is that still on schedule for 30 days? I think that's what I saw in your prospectus back in June.
spk09: We're working through the commissioning at this point right now, and the expectation is that we complete commissioning by the end of March.
spk04: Okay. No, no, but I meant after the commissioning and you start up, is it a 30-day run cycle for...
spk09: Yes, it is. Yes, that's correct.
spk04: And on the EPA, they're totally trying to sound American, but anyways, on the EPA, is it requirement for every different feedstock?
spk09: Yes, yes it is. And the level of application with respect to that is certainly something that is a lot of work and a lot of detail. and that's part of that whole process is being able to provide lab results around the expected air quality or what happens if we put things into the air. There's an incineration piece as well. There's a lot of things that go into the application for each type of waste that we're looking to test.
spk04: Okay, and one final question. What Gary had asked prior, I understand where he's coming from, But I also believe that it's sort of standard practice that whenever any company, regardless of mining company or anything else, finds or has a product that they need to sell, they always get independent third-party validation. That would depend on the certification of the third party, like the lab that is testing it, and they would put their stamp of approval on it. So I'm assuming that was sort of... already on the drawing board that once you get your results, you send it, have somebody analyze it, and put their engineering stamp on it, an independent third body, correct?
spk09: Yeah, that is correct. Not only from the process and the production aspect, but also the end product quality has to go through laboratory testing as it relates to content of the diesel to ensure it meets spec, whether it be highway grade, marine grade, or other or the sustainable aviation fuel that we would have to provide that independent third-party lab analysis for our customers for. So absolutely, right from the start to the finish. Perfect. Great. Thank you. You're welcome.
spk02: Thank you. Next is a follow-up from Brandon Cutler. Please go ahead.
spk06: Thank you. I just have a question. So in Canada here, March 28th, we have the federal budget coming out. And I understand from what I hear in the news that is going to focus on clean energy. And I'm just wondering, armed with the data that's going to be coming from the R&D facility, do you think that Cielo is going to be in a position to benefit from, say, tax credits or other opportunities in terms of the opportunities for investment from the federal government? Do you think that the R&D facility will allow Cielo to benefit from that?
spk01: Thank you for the question, Brandon. I can take this one. We believe at this time those opportunities are there, but we have to be mindful that a lot of, based on our research, the focus of a lot of these, not the tax credits, but the government funding is for a full scale. So the closer we get to that, the more access to looking at the criteria we will have to that funding. But yes, we will be keeping an eye on that budget and we will be assessing where CLO fits in as well. So appreciate that question. Thank you very much, Jessie. You're welcome, Brandon. Have a great day.
spk02: Thank you. Next question will be for Carmen Calderera, investor. Please go ahead.
spk07: Hi, everyone. Just want a quick follow-up on the Dunmore. Is that going to be the Seattle's full investment, or will that be partnership with the previous like 10 facilities that you had signed the agreement with? And is that still on schedule? Because I remember the last time that, uh you guys were saying that you were still negotiating or they wanted to tweak something on the original contract that you guys had so uh just want to see where you guys stand with that with the other 10 with the that next facility the next 10 facilities with them um yeah no we're it's still ongoing so first of all first part of that question is yes the dunmore slash medicine hat facility is going to be our first full-scale facility uh that is
spk09: essentially tied to, no pun intended, the railroad tie processing that we have agreed to with CP Rail. Subsequent to that, the structure of the financing of the facility is currently held with an MOU with Renewable U, and the other part of that would be a contemplated partnership structure. or JV, depending on how you want to slice and dice. It's around tax advice and some of the other things that we're going through at the moment to understand fully what that looks like from a structural standpoint. But that is the current agreement that we have in place, and that's how we're going to proceed.
spk07: Okay, great. So they are in line so you guys can move ahead once the research and development is, if it proves successful, that we can move ahead with this full scale rather quickly instead of trying to, like, you know, go through all the red tape?
spk09: Yes, that's fine.
spk07: Okay. Yep. Thank you.
spk02: Thank you. Next is a follow-up from Gary Depp. Please go ahead.
spk08: Thank you. Ryan, I... watched your interview with lethbridge news the other day and one of the questions that came up was about the feedstock and i guess the the consistency and quality um i'm thinking about plastics uh obviously you know going a little bit down the road here and hopefully we get to a successful trials with railway ties and then rubber etc but how would you ensure in canada that a you're getting you know i i would imagine the chemistry is that PET1 plastic is not the same as a 2 or a 4 or a 5 and they're all different and as well as just the cleanliness of getting the inputs into the system. Can you maybe shed a little bit of light on how that would work because that's clearly going to be a bit problematic while there's a lot of plastic out there it's in various shapes and forms.
spk09: Yeah, and of course, as you know, I'm just the business guy, Gary, so to speculate, I guess, would be a little bit of a difficult thing for me to do. But I did say on the interview that it is still kind of, especially in Canada, there's a single-use plastics ban, as you know, that's come into place, and it has already hit me where it hurts by not having my spill stopper on my Starbucks drink and drive-through. That one bothered me. But besides that, we're working through exactly what that looks like in the trial. So let's table that with the expectation that we will have an answer to how we're able to separate the seven different kinds of plastics, I think, as it relates to it. And then, of course, deciding how we're able to engage with a party that wants to pay us to take it to dispose of and create a fuel from it. Right. Okay.
spk08: And I guess the same, and I think Ryan Carruthers may be on the call, I guess the same thing sort of applies in thinking about tires. There's obviously a lot of tires that are disposed of each year. I guess my question was, how do you get the steel belts out of a tire that could feed your process? I don't expect an answer here, but it's also just the waste feedstock is not pure. There's always some contamination in it before it gets into your process, correct? Yeah.
spk09: Yep, that's correct. And part of the rubber conversations that have been had, and Ryan Carruthers, unfortunately, he's on the road this week, so he's not on the call, but really big magnets is typically the answer that we're hearing as it relates to getting the steel belts out of certain parts of the rubber tires. But to that point, the rubber tires are certainly a lot more consistent in their makeup than would be the plastics, as an example. Okay, thanks.
spk02: Thank you. And at this time, Mr. Jackson, Ms. Dhaliwal, we have no other questions registered. Please proceed with closing remarks.
spk09: All right. Jaz Deep, do you want to start? I always call her Jaz.
spk01: Of course. Thank you, everyone, for your continuing support. We've been dealing with really creating a vision for Cielo. As we look at these quarterly financials for Q3, we get even more excited for where Q4 is headed and year-end is around the corner, April 30th. And we look forward to connecting with you with further exciting news come sometime in June. And thank you again for your continuing support. Ryan, back to you.
spk09: Thanks, Jazdeep. And also, I want to throw out, clearly there's a lot more people that are behind this company and both from a shareholder, stakeholder, and management and employees and those that we've just hired to start ramping up in Alderside and everything else. And I'd be remiss, first of all, to not thank Jasdeep and her team for putting together what has been a much stronger financial picture moving forward. And we'll only continue to build on that momentum. But also thank you to everyone who made the call today. and have the questions. We're always excited to answer any questions you might have. And you can email us at investors at CLOWS.com or, of course, hit us up on the website. We'll be adding a lot of these questions that were today onto our website going forward so that there's a constant updating of the questions and the things that we receive as an interest to everybody else. So thanks again, everyone. And Sylvie, back to you.
spk02: Ladies and gentlemen, this does indeed conclude your conference call for today. Once again, thank you for attending. At this time, we do ask that you please disconnect your lines.
Disclaimer