This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk03: Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to today's Xcel Energy Year-End 2022 Earnings Conference Call. For your information, today's conference is being recorded. Questions will be taken from institutional investors. Reporters can conduct media relations with inquiries of individual investors, and others can reach out to Investor Relations. At this time, I turn the conference over to your host today, Mr. Paul Johnson, Vice President, Investor Relations, and Treasurer. Please go ahead, sir.
spk07: Good morning and welcome to Xcel Energy's 2002 fourth quarter earnings call. Joining me today are Bob Frenzel, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Brian Van Abel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In addition, we have other members of the management team in the room to answer questions if needed. This morning we will review our 2022 results and highlights and share recent business developments and regulatory developments. Slides that accompany today's call are available on our website. As a reminder, some of our comments during today's call may contain forward-looking information. Significant factors that could cause results for those anticipated are described in our earnings release and our SEC filings. Today, we'll also discuss certain metrics that are non-GAAP measures. Information on the comparable GAAP measures and reconciliations are included in our earnings release. I'll now turn the call over to Bob Frenzel.
spk11: Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our fourth quarter call. We had another very successful year at Xcel Energy, continuing to execute on our strategy while delivering strong financial and operational performance. For our investors, we delivered EPS of $3.17, representing the 18th consecutive year of meeting or exceeding our initial earnings guidance. In February, we raised our annual dividend for the 19th straight year, increasing it 12 cents per share or 6.6%. More recently in November, we extended our long-term investment plan, which features a 10-year capital outlook with an approximate 7% rate-based growth. We ranked in the top quartile in customer reliability, or SADI, and our residential electric bills are more than 20% below the national average. And amidst the backdrop of significant commodity increases this year, Xcel Energy's 4,500 megawatts of owned wind farm continued to be an industry leader in net capacity factor performance and generated approximately $1 billion of fuel-related customer savings in 2022 and almost $3 billion since 2017. Our nuclear fleet remains the top-performing fleet in the country and achieved a capacity factor of 96% last year. We had an active regulatory year and resolved multiple rate cases in URI storm cost recovery proceedings. The Commissions in Minnesota and Colorado approved resource plans that will add nearly 10,000 megawatts of utility scale renewables to our systems through this decade. The Minnesota Commission approved our 460 megawatt Sherco solar project. The Colorado Commission approved our $2 billion power pathway transmission project. And MISO awarded us $1.2 billion of transmission projects, and we accelerated our timeline for transitioning out of coal and now expect to be coal-free by the end of 2030, all of which contribute to our leadership in clean energy transition for our customers. We continue to lead in carbon reduction as well. 2022, our estimated carbon emissions were approximately 52% below 2005 levels, And we remain on track to achieve 80% carbon reduction across the company by 2030. The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act will reduce the cost of renewables for our customers, improves cash flow and credit metrics for the company, and enhances the competitiveness of our renewable offerings. Continue to execute on our electric vehicle vision, implementing multiple new programs for our customers. We also filed comprehensive transportation plans in Minnesota and Wisconsin that are pending commission approval. We've advanced our ESG leadership and have been recognized by multiple entities, including an upgraded rating by MSCI from AA to AAA. And finally, we are named among the world's most ethical, admired, and responsible companies. And we are recognized for being a best veteran employer, as well as for our disability inclusion in the workplace. I'm really proud to lead a team that can deliver on operational, financial, environmental, and diversity goals all simultaneously. Looking ahead, we're well positioned for sustainable organic growth over the next decade, including affordable renewable additions in our resource plans, the transmission needed to enable those carbon-free resources, and responsible community transitions as we retire our coal plants. We've recently issued requests for proposals in Minnesota, Colorado, and at SPS seeking approximately 6,000 megawatts of new renewable generation, a portion of the 10,000 megawatts that have been approved in our jurisdiction. We'll submit our recommended portfolios of generation assets to our commissions by the middle of this year and anticipate decisions in the second half of this year. We also expect to issue additional RFPs in Minnesota and Colorado this year, and next year for the remainder of our approved needs. As we've discussed in the past, we believe that we have a geographical advantage in the clean energy transition due to the strong wind and solar resources in our service territory. This access to low-cost renewable energy should also give us further advantage in developing green hydrogen and other clean fuel projects, which are becoming more feasible as a result of federal support from the Infrastructure and Jobs Act and the IRA. Late last year, we submitted hydrogen hub concept papers for both the Rocky Mountain and the Upper Midwest regions to the Department of Energy to compete for awards from the $8 billion hydrogen hub program. In December, we received favorable notice from the DOE for our concepts and were encouraged to submit full applications in April. In addition, our pink hydrogen production pilot at our Prairie Island nuclear generating stations expected to be operational this year. Finally, we expect to bring forward opportunities this year to utilize clean fuels and green hydrogen blending at both our gas fire generation stations and in our gas networks for home and building heating. As we continue to utilize innovative technologies to decarbonize our business, we are well positioned to take advantage of potentially significant hydrogen capital investment opportunities in the future. As the penetration of renewable assets in our states increases, we're also interested in pursuing advanced storage opportunities to balance our electric system needs. Today, we're excited to announce a new partnership with Form Energy to develop two long-duration energy storage pilot projects. Form Energy's 100-hour battery technology could be a critical component to our decarbonization strategy, providing the resiliency and reliability that we need on the system to support our significant renewable portfolio. We plan to deploy a 10 megawatt multi-day storage system at a retiring coal plant in both Minnesota and Colorado. These projects are expected to be online as early as 2025. And as we wrap up, I want to thank the thousands of employees who worked in below zero temperatures, sustained high winds, and several feet of wet, heavy snow to keep the lights on and the houses warm during our recent winter storms. Your efforts exemplify our company values of connected, committed, trustworthy, and safe. And I believe that our dedicated employees and partners are what distinguishes Xcel Energy with our customers.
spk04: With that, I'll turn it over to Brian. Thanks, Bob, and good morning, all.
spk10: We had another strong year, recording earnings of $3.17 per share for 2022, compared with $2.96 per share in 2021. This represents EPS growth of 7.1%, slightly above our long-term growth rate target of 5% to 7%. The most significant earnings drivers for the year included the following. Higher electric and natural gas margins increased earnings by $1.05 per share, primarily driven by regulatory outcomes and riders to recover capital investments. In addition, a lower effective tax rate increased earnings by 15 cents per share. But keep in mind, production tax credits lower the ETR. PTCs are flowed back to customers through lower electric margin are largely earnings neutral. Offsetting these positive drivers were increased depreciation expense, which reduced earnings by 40 cents per share, reflecting our capital investment program. Higher O&M expense, which decreased earnings by 24 cents per share. Higher interest expense and other taxes, primarily property taxes, decreased earnings by $0.23 per share, and other items combined reduced earnings by $0.12 per share. Turning to sales, our weather-adjusted electric sales increased by 1.8%, largely due to higher CNI sales driven by strong economic activity in our service territories. We anticipate a modest slowing of our sales with growth of 1% in 2023. Shifting to expense, O&M expenses increased $170 million for the year, driven by costs related to technology and customer programs, storms, vegetation management, inflation, and additional actions due to weather. We also invested in our employees to ensure we retained our top talent. While we expect inflationary pressures to remain, we continue to focus on our continuous improvement programs, which we expect to drive increased productivity and efficiency. As a result, we anticipate O&M expenses will decline approximately 2% in 2023. We've made progress on a number of regulatory proceedings. In the Minnesota natural gas rate case, the ALJ recommended the Commission approve our settlement, which reflects a rate increase of $21 million, an ROE of 9.57%, an equity ratio of 52.5%, a decoupling mechanism, and a property tax tracker. We anticipate a Commission decision later this year. In the Minnesota Electric Rate case, the Commission accepted our proposal to reduce our requests for MISO capacity revenue and establish a tracker. Hearings were completed in December and we continue to meet with parties to see if we can reach a constructive settlement. However, we have a strong case and are comfortable with a fully litigated outcome absent in the settlement. We anticipate a Commission decision later in 2023. In November of 2022, we filed an electric rate case in Colorado seeking a net increase of $262 million based on an ROE of 10.25%, an equity ratio of 55.7%, and a 2023 forward test year. We anticipate a commission decision and implementation of final rates in the third quarter. We also filed a New Mexico electric rate case seeking a rate increase of $78 million based on an ROE of 10.75%, equity ratio of 54.7%, a forecast test year in the early retirement of the total coal plant. We anticipate a commission decision and implementation of final rates in the fourth quarter. As far as future filings, we plan to file a Texas rate case later in the quarter and Wisconsin in the second quarter. As we have discussed in the past, the Inflation Reduction Act provides significant customer benefits. Key elements include the following. Tax credit transferability will provide $1.8 billion of liquidity, increasing cash flow and reducing equity needs. We've met with companies in our service territory and expect to enter into bilateral tax credit sale contracts later this year. Our FFO to debt metrics improved by 100 basis points during the forecast time period. The solar PTC and tax credit transferability improved the competitiveness of our renewable bids. and we anticipate pricing will decline on solar projects by 25 to 40% and wind projects by 50 to 60% due to the new and extended tax credits, which is great for our customers as we embark on this clean energy transition. Finally, we don't anticipate any material impact from AMT as a result of makers' appreciation and existing tax credits on our balance sheet. We're reaffirming our 2023 earnings guidance range of $3.30 to $3.40 per share, which is consistent with our long-term EPS growth objective of 5% to 7%. We have updated our key assumptions to reflect actual year-end results, which are detailed in our earnings release. With that, I'll wrap up with a quick summary. We had a strong operational and financial year in 2022. We delivered 20-22 earnings within our guidance range, the 18th consecutive year, and increased our dividend for the 19th consecutive year. We received approval of our research plans in Colorado and Minnesota, which will result in approximately 10,000 megawatts of new renewables. The Inflation Reduction Act was passed with significant benefits for our customers and the company. We are reaffirming 2023 guidance consistent with our long-term earnings growth rate. We remain confident we can continue to deliver long-term earnings and dividend growth within the upper half of our 5% to 7% objective range as we lead the clean energy transition and keep bills low for our customers. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, we will now take questions.
spk03: Thank you very much, sir. As a reminder to the participants, if you'd like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is not turned on in order to license your equipment. Again, please press star 1 to ask a question. We'll pause for just a moment to give everybody a chance to signal.
spk06: You can hear me, right? Yep. Okay.
spk03: First question is coming from Mr. Nick Capadella calling from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Your line is open, sir.
spk06: Hey, good morning, everyone. Hey, thanks for taking the question. So I guess just on the O&M and the 23 Guide, that really stuck out to us. And I heard some of your comments in the prepared remarks talking about continuous improvement. Can you maybe just give us a little bit more on what levers you're pulling that's leading to that O&M reduction?
spk10: and is this you know more one time in nature to 23 or sustainable through the plan thank you hey nick uh yeah good question and a couple let me make a couple points on it one is a little bit of a function of where actuals in 2022 ended up in terms of updating our 2023 onm guidance but you know we're really proud of the continuous improvement efforts that we've had underway and they've been underway for a long time you know from 2014 to 2021 we kept on them flat And that's something I'm really proud of our employees for doing and a really good benefit to our customers. We did have inflationary pressures in 2022, but also took actions given the good weather year to reinvest in 2022 in the system and in our employees. As I think about 2023, you know, a couple of things. One is now we're investing a lot in technology and how do we make us more efficient in our plants We have something called the Digital Operations Factory, which is really using AI in our plants to move from more reactive to productive maintenance. We're investing significantly in, call it, real-time scheduling and other opportunities to use AI. We also are starting to get on a treadmill of shutting down our coal plants. We have bought a coal unit a year that will start to shut down, which provides us with a tailwind as we think not only in 23 but through basically the end of this decade in terms of as we lead this clean energy transition. And then we also do see some abatement of the high diesel costs. We had a storm year that was above normal in 2022. For example, we had quintuple the normal storm days in December. So there are some things that happened in 22 that won't happen in 23 that should help us achieve it. So a long answer, but a lot there to unpack and hopefully that helped provide some color on it.
spk06: Yeah, that's great. Thank you so much. That's helpful. And on the Minnesota Electric case, you know, it sounds like you're confident in taking this the full distance to an order, but I just wanted to be clear, is the settlement more unlikely at this point and how should we kind of be thinking about that, you know, taking into consideration where we are in the docket today?
spk11: Hey, Nick, it's Bob. Thanks for the question. And as we said in the prepared remarks, you know, we filed this case over a year ago. We've probably been actively working with parties since the September timeframe. And, you know, we've reduced our total initial ask dramatically through extension of asset lives, through the MISO capacity revenues, and for bringing down the actual sales that we experience in the state. So we think that that, you know, reduced revenue ask is really a tailwind for us in the case. There's probably some pretty decent recent decisions in Minnesota. You saw the Minnesota Power case the other day, and our gas that Brian mentioned in his prepared remarks or data points that we feel confident in taking this, as you say, all the way. But we're always open to engaging with all the parties, and if there's an opportunity to move forward with a settlement, we would certainly think to do so.
spk04: Thanks a lot. I'll get back in the queue. Have a great day. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
spk03: We'll now go to David Arcaro calling from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
spk00: Thanks so much for taking my question. I was wondering if you might be able to give any kind of preview or what we could expect from the Clean Heat Plan filing later this year in Colorado, whether there might be potential CapEx investments, additions to the plan, and what new technologies and opportunities there might be to invest there.
spk11: Hey, David, it's Bob. This is a great question. Look, we're excited about the Clean Heat Plan opportunity. It's really an opportunity for us, I think, to share and align our vision for a net zero future on the gas business with our commissions in a more formal way. I'm not certain that I would expect to see a significant amount of sort of new investment opportunities as part of that process, but really an opportunity to align on our multi-pronged strategy to decarbonize the gas business. As I think about it, we're working with upstream providers to reduce methane on the purchase gas that we buy for our customers. We're working on our own system. We have been for over the past decade in methane leak reduction. We've done a terrific job there, but there's always more work to tighten up our own system. Then we work on customer programs that encourage energy efficiency, that encourage Um, maybe fuel switching and, and beneficial electrification. Uh, and then I think the big opportunity from an investment perspective is really, uh, the comments I made around, you know, clean fuel, uh, in my prepared remarks. Uh, we are working with multiple parties in the Colorado jurisdiction on a Rocky mountain hydrogen hub. Uh, we think it's a really attractive project, a multi-state MOU has been signed with several of the Western states and the governors and all the energy offices of those states are working together. So I think clean fuel is a real opportunity for us and for our customers to advance the clean energy transition and to help us realize a net zero future in the gas business.
spk10: Yeah, Dave, and I'll just add a couple points to that. One is we don't have anything in our current five-year plan related to hydrogen investment opportunities. So to the point of if there's an opportunity to pull that forward and move faster in hydrogen, absolutely an upside opportunity as we think about it over the next five years. But also a lot of call it – industry discussion about natural gas commodity costs and the volatility. We think longer term, us owning renewables and creating green hydrogen, blending it into the LDC creates more price certainty for our customers and takes that volatility out. So I think that's a longer term opportunity and benefit as we think about how do we help our natural gas customers and improve the certainty of our overall bills.
spk11: Just broadly, I mentioned this in my prepared remarks, but it's probably worth saying again, which is we're benefited by the geography that we sit in, having great access to low-cost wind and low-cost solar. Not only should we be able to do this for our customers beneficially, but you're looking at the opportunity of making the Rocky Mountain region or the upper Midwest regions energy export centers where we're creating a product that can be broadly transmitted to the rest of the country, whether that's electricity via wire or whether that's green hydrogen via pipe or trucking. We should be a destination for those installations, which over time should help economic development in our states and add to employment backlogs as well.
spk00: That's really helpful, Culler. Thanks for that. A lot of initiatives, it sounds like, related to that program that you'll be rolling out. Separately on the announcement with form energy and long-duration storage, it's nice to see that crystallizing here. I was wondering if you might have a sense for how much long-duration storage might make sense on your system over time. Is there a certain number of megawatts or a proportion relative to your generation fleet that might make sense? Wondering how you might see this scale up to the extent these initial projects are successful and make it through the regulatory process.
spk11: Yeah, thanks, David. You know, as we go through resource plans with each of our states, you know, we find that we have an increasing need for, as we have higher penetration of renewables, an increasing need for what we'll call dispatchable energy resources. And historically, those would have been, you know, combustion turbines. Maybe they're fired with a clean fuel like hydrogen or a synthetic natural gas. Over time, as long-duration storage might become more feasible and cost-effective, you can see duration, long duration storage being a part of that solution. I think if I were to add up, and I'm going to do this math on the fly, but we have several thousand megawatts in our resource plans for, you know, firm dispatchable generation. And if we had an asset, you know, lithium ion batteries are interesting and they have a utilization for our systems, but so does long duration storage. You know, these are 20 megawatt projects. You know, there's probably... several hundred in our resource plans that could be realizable within the next five to 10 years if the technology proves out.
spk10: Yeah, and I would just add to that, you know, we're really excited about this technology. It shows that we're leading and really demonstrating that we're on the forefront of this clean energy transition. And, you know, we've always talked about we know how to get to our 2030 goals of 80 plus percent carbon reduction. And so this is really about taking that last 15 to 20 percent out of the stack and providing one of the solutions. So if you think about that. And when you look at our kind of resource mix in 2030, you can kind of start to size, you know, what do we need to do beyond that in terms of storage capabilities that will be, you know, one of the solutions.
spk04: Great. Thanks again. Appreciate all the color. Thank you, Mr. When I go to Jeremy, it's from JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
spk02: Hi, good morning. It's actually Rich Sunderland on for Jeremy. Thank you for the time today. Great job. Maybe starting with changes to your 23 drivers, I know we hit O&M already, but I'm just curious if you can kind of parse the full range of what are effectively true-ups for 22 actuals versus new expectations for 23. Are any of these changes putting you kind of higher or lower within the guidance range at this point in time?
spk10: you know just right off the start right you know we're still feel you know midpoint of the guidance range early in the year is is where where we expect to be and in terms of you know specific changes right gas sales is is up a little bit but that's really a function where we landed on the year end and really gas sales for us one percent is less than five million dollars in terms of a change um the the increase in the rider revenue um that's a function of we had a good wind in ptc year in 2022 So that's relatively earnings neutral. We do see a little bit of benefit depreciation and interest expenses lower. Let's see, the forecasted rates for 2023 are lower than in Q3, but overall we look at it as relatively neutral as we think about the puts and takes and still, you know, targeting midpoint of the guidance range and, you know, looking forward to having the discussion 12 months from now and our goals to deliver for the 19th straight year.
spk02: Great, thanks for the color there. And then turning back to Colorado and a lot of their focus on the gas system claiming side, you addressed this a little bit from the clean heat plan perspective, but I'm curious for your higher level thoughts on how this might impact your electric operations in the state as well.
spk11: Hey, Rich, it's Bob. You know, look, I did mention as part of our clean heat plan and our long-term strategy for decarbonizing on behalf of our customers that we do expect some amount of beneficial electrification to happen, whether that's water heaters or cooking or home heating. But we believe that the asset value of the distribution system is incredibly valuable for our customers and has the ability to deliver a significant amount of energy on the coldest days in Colorado. Our design temperature that we plan for in Colorado is minus 30. So it's still a very cold weather climate, has a need for a very efficient delivery system, which we believe the pipeline system is there. Now, I do think that we can put, you know, as part of our strategy is to look at, you know, clean fuels and green hydrogen and synthetic natural gas and the opportunity that presents for our customers to realize, you know, a good product at an affordable price that's also sustainable is important. But electrically, I mean, with EVs and beneficial electrification, as we think about the future of our electric business in Colorado, there's probably growth there that's driven by both of those aspects.
spk04: Got it. Very clear on both sides. Thank you for the time today. Thank you, Minister.
spk03: We'll now move to Julian DeMoula, Smith of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk05: Thank you.
spk13: Hey, good morning, team. Thanks for the time and the opportunity. Nicely done. So perhaps just on – Hey, guys. So just first on bills, I just want to understand a little bit on the trajectory of bills. Can you talk a little bit on what the rate increases are on customers for this winter, especially on the gas side? And then also just given the cresting that we've seen in some of the commodity prices here, how is that setting itself up to ultimately get reflected to back to your customers? If you think about the cadence of your hedging programs.
spk10: Yeah. Hey Julian. Um, good question. And we think about, you know, I'll, I'll talk a little bit about, um, both sides of the business. Cause we think about on the electric side, um, really well positioned from overall customer bill perspective. Now we're calling 85% electric. And if you just look at, um, Our income statement and the cost of goods sold and fuel impacts and the electric side is modest, given the inflationary environment we we saw in 2022 about talked about it right it's really it's our wind build out that we've always talked about being a hedge for rising commodity costs and that's played out in 2022 and really good to see from a customer bill perspective. And also, you know, we went into the year being, you know, on a national average, more than 20% lower on residential customer bills. So a good place and a good place to be on the electric side. Obviously, on the natural gas LDC side, you know, you have a lot fewer levers and a lot fewer offsets. And so you saw some of the headlines of 40 to 50% of bill impacts for our customers. Obviously, you know, Patrick O' You know, we do not like to see any sort of bill impacts of that magnitude, but you're absolutely right that that is starting to subside with where natural gas prices are going Patrick O' And if you caught it, we've just in the past two months we've twice updated our gas commodity clause in colorado which lowered the gas port the commodity portion of the customer's bills by about 30 percent that they'll start to feel feel in q1 relative to q4 because we're actually going to be over collected so we proactively did that and the commission was appreciative of that so we're certainly taking every opportunity we can to make sure that we have um reflecting the lower commodity costs in our customers so that's that's really where we see i think longer term we feel really good
spk11: about delivering bills at the level of inflation as we think about 2030 and beyond and what the ira is is doing for us and for our customers um so we feel good both near term and longer term as we think about it hey julian i look at bob i'll agree with everything brian said and add if you look at the long arc of history and look forward over the last 10 years and into the next 10 years i think that comment around bills at or below the inflation level is consistent on the electric and gas side. This has been a tough year on the gas side. We're empathetic and we worked hard with the federal government to enable significant amounts of, record amounts of LIHEAP and then actively getting that into the people's hands that need it the most. Longer term, clean energy transition, I think we can do this, as we said, because we're strategically advantaged in our position, we can do this very cost effectively across the country and we have a good starting point total bills and what our customers feel 20% below the national average or more in our residential electric areas. And our gas business, I think you highlighted this in one of your reports, is one of the top two or three lowest gas businesses in the country. So a good starting point, but doesn't mean we don't have work to do. And obviously, we're always empathetic to our customers who are feeling bill increases at the grocery store. at the fuel pump at rent and mortgage payments and everything else. But thanks for the opportunity to talk about it. Yeah, absolutely.
spk13: You bet. Hey, listen, just going back to one of the questions from earlier, on the settlement conversation versus fully litigated cases, obviously the current backdrop isn't ideal for having rating increases altogether. Can you talk a little bit about expectations of people who settle cases broadly speaking here? I mean, to what extent could Minnesota be an isolated data point in the current instance, given the current fact pattern, or are you seeing challenges more broadly here, again, without pointing fingers at specific states necessarily?
spk11: Well, I'll start, Julian, and Brian can add on if he's got anything to add. I think generally we look for settlements. I think we're encouraged to look for settlements. I even think as you look at some of the recent data points, In Minnesota, the Commission's looking for settlements. So with that as backdrop, maybe this case is isolated. Maybe we still have a path to reach a settlement with the parties. And I think we're being encouraged to do so. I think broadly speaking, that's the case for most of our jurisdictions and most of our staff. We need to make sure that we are delivering for our customers operationally. We're delivering for our customers in reliability, but we also need to make sure that we keep a financially healthy utility. Credit metrics are really important. Preserving credit metrics in our operating companies is critical as we seek to raise capital cost advantageously and to deliver on the capital investment profile that we know we need to do. So I think therein is where the debate happens. And again, I think we've got a long track record of settling and then So I would take your comment as encouraging to think that we're going to continue to settle cases going forward.
spk04: Yeah, absolutely understand. All right, great. Thank you, guys. Appreciate it. Thank you, sir. We'll now take questions from Travis Miller calling from Morningstar. Please go ahead, sir.
spk09: Hi, everyone. Thank you. Hey, Travis. Obviously, you had a good year with the CNI demands. I wonder, what's your outlook in that 1% total sales for CNI? Are we seeing another big year, or does that moderate a bit?
spk10: Hey, Travis, yeah, I can take that one. No, I think we continue to see... similar what we saw in 2022 where strong growth in the cni if i parse it out we have what we're expecting is about two percent up in cni for 2023 and about a one percent decline in residential um right continued kind of decline from the covid levels that we saw the increase in residential cni particularly good growth in sps and i think just on the 2022 sales when you look at the cni numbers you see that Colorado CNI is negative. But if you actually make an adjustment, we helped a large customer install a 240 megawatt solar farm to ensure that they stayed in Colorado, ensure those jobs stayed in Colorado. And so if you made that adjustment, Colorado CNI would actually have been a plus 2% for the year. So strong economic activity in CNI growth across all of our service territories. We expect that, you know, albeit a little bit of slowing in 2023, but to remain there. Okay. Great.
spk09: And then a follow-up to the Hydrogen Hub discussion. I think if I heard you correctly, April was kind of the next point at which you file some more information. At what point is it there, or is it later on where you start getting a sense for even your proposal, if not approval, but a proposal for CapEx potential spending?
spk11: Yeah, Travis, I think it's early innings with the departments. April's the next filing date for, I'll call it, full plans. I think the Department of Energy is looking at probably around two dozen, so it's gonna take them a while to parse through that in award grants for the, I'm gonna guess, four to six that move forward from that perspective. We think both of our projects are incredibly interesting, provide lots of regional benefits from multiple sources and multiple users, which I think is a criteria that the department's gonna look at, but if you're gonna ask me to guess, I'd say it's at least end of next year before we get any clarity on those April applications, potentially longer.
spk10: Yeah, but expect us, you know, that's the hydrogen hub concepts of which, you know, very interested in. And I think we have a great opportunity to be significant participants, but also expect us to move forward with hydrogen pilots and opportunities both on the electric side and the gas side as we think about working through our clean heat plan in Colorado, our Natural Gas Innovation Act in Minnesota, and then also on the electric side as we think about how do we decarbonize that last 15 to 20% in our stack. Sure. Okay.
spk09: End of next year being 2024. Correct. Okay. And then just real quick on that, how many partners are in those two proposals, the Rocky Mountain and the Midwest proposals?
spk11: You know, I wouldn't get back to the specific number, Travis, but I'm going to guess it's in the 5 to 10 in each region. Okay. Just looking for a rough number.
spk09: Okay.
spk04: Very good. That's all I had. Thanks. Appreciate it. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
spk03: We'll now take questions from Mr. Paul Patterson from Glenrock Associates. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
spk01: Hey, good morning. Hey, Paul. Can you hear me? Hey. Yep. So I hear you on the Minnesota regulatory environment. It's pretty much what I've been hearing. But one thing that I was a little surprised by, it's hard to keep track of everything, there was some articles about some sort of state goal of being below the national average by 5% and I think industrials made a filing about this or have been saying that the rates are in danger of or what have you, about being in line with that policy. And I was just wondering, could you just refresh my memory about what this state policy goal is and sort of following up on Julian's question, you know, the trajectory, how you see you guys' performance within that thing going forward, because we have changes in moderation of fuel prices and stuff going forward. There are a lot of moving pieces, I guess. I'm just sort of wondering if you could, and frankly, I'm just not up to speed on the law that they're talking about.
spk08: Hi, Paul. This is Chris Clark. I'm the president of our Minnesota company. Yes, there is a goal and statute that seeks to have our prices for our commercial and industrial class be within 95% of the national average. I think the starting point here is really that we provide our customers a great value. And I think the look that got some attention is simply a look at the rate. But if you actually look at our total bills for our CNI class, you'll see that over a 10-year period, they've been relatively flat. And that's because the EIA data that gets pulled for rates is only one component of the bill. So I think when you look at what we achieved for our CNI class, if you take into account the conservation programs that have been really nation-leading here in Minnesota and other credits and things that those customers have done to be successful, you'll see that our CNI class rates are competitive. And in fact, we do a great job of attracting new business to our state. So I think it's important when we look at the picture of how we're doing with our CNI rates to really take that into account. And as Brian and Bob have said, when we look at the plans for our clean energy transition, we're confident that we can deliver those results in line or less than CPI And I think over the long term, we've shown that we can continue to be a successful company in navigating this, keeping rates affordable for our customers, and delivering great value. Okay, awesome.
spk01: Great answer. Now, the second question I have, and I apologize if I missed this. I got just interrupted here. The iron battery deployment, I apologize if you already discussed this, but are you just going to own these? And what's the cost of them? Or could you just give a little bit more flavor of the economics associated with these two projects?
spk10: Yeah, good question. We haven't disclosed the cost of these batteries yet. We haven't made the regulatory filings yet. And we're looking forward to having a discussion with our stakeholders in the commission. But we certainly will own them. We think they're a valuable grid asset and important to us to own them as we think about how do we start to deploy these new technologies as we look to decarbonize and get to 100% carbon free. So obviously with any new technology, the costs are more expensive, but this is a $100 battery that we don't see other solutions out there that are viable. And it also, iron oxide, right, if you think about rare metals, this is something that's readily available. as we think about supply chains and what's the ability to scale. So overall, we're pretty excited about this. I think it demonstrates our leadership as an innovative clean tech company, and we're excited to work with our commissions. But certainly more to come in terms of disclosing the cost.
spk01: Okay, great. Just any idea when you guys might make that regulatory filing, roughly speaking?
spk10: Later this year.
spk09: It'll be this year.
spk01: Okay. I mean, you guys are deploying it in 2025, right? Yep. Okay. Okay, I'll stay tuned. Thanks so much.
spk04: Thank you much, sir. Our next question is coming from Mr. Anthony Crodell of Mizuho.
spk03: Please go ahead, sir.
spk12: Hey, good morning. Thanks for squeezing me in here. Just hopefully two quick ones. I guess when you look at the four major rate filings you guys have, they're all asking for a forward test year. When we look at 2023 and beyond, what do you think is a reasonable assumption for structural lag? Can that be reduced from, say, 90 to 100 basis points to maybe 50, 60?
spk10: Hey, Anthony, good question. As we think about it from an For an ROE perspective, that's always been a goal of ours, right? We had a goal in 2015 to close it from 100 to 50 bits, and we were successful. And then in 2018, 19, and then had some COVID hit, and then we scaled back on regulatory filings. I think as we look forward, our goal is to close that, and we had some success from 2021 to 2022, albeit modest, about 15 bits. And so our goal is to continue to focus on closing that. And probably that 50 basis point range, as you mentioned, is a good goal as we think about the going forward. And something that we always focus on improving the regulatory constructs and getting, you know, as we think about either multi-year plans or longer-term plans, really providing the benefit of price certainty to our customers, I think is really important and something we'll continue to work through.
spk12: Great. And just one follow-up on top of Julian's question. I think, Bob, you had mentioned you prefer the settlement route, and not just specific to Minnesota, but just in general. It seems that lately some commissions maybe are tinkering with settlements, if I use that term. It seems that that's maybe occurring at a greater frequency. Does that give you pause on achieving a settlement?
spk11: Hey, Anthony, it's Bob. Great to see your name in the inbox today. no it doesn't give me pause um look i think we've had a long history here we continue to work proactively with staffs and commissions um and sometimes we go before aljs and and there's always things that are around the edges important um but i think generally speaking you know settlements are encouraged and and uh i think commissions understand that they want to encourage settlements that they they need to be respect the entirety of them without tinkering i think you've seen some and some of the jurisdictions you might have been thinking about to that fact.
spk12: Great. Thank you so much, guys, and congrats on the quarter.
spk11: Yeah, I appreciate it. Thanks, Anthony.
spk03: Thank you very much, sir. And as we appear to have no further questions, Brian, I'm going to turn the conference back over to you for any additional or closing remarks. Thank you.
spk10: Yeah, thank you all for participating in our earnings call this morning. Please contact our investor relations team with any follow-up questions.
spk04: Thank you, sir.
spk03: Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude today's conference. We thank for your attendance.
Disclaimer