National Health Investors, Inc.

Q3 2021 Earnings Conference Call

11/8/2021

spk05: Greetings and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the National Health Investors Third Quarter 2021 Conference Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode, and afterwards we'll conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, if you have a question, please press the 1 followed by the 4 on your telephone. If at any time during the conference you need to reach an operator, please press star 0. This conference is being recorded Monday, November 8, 2021. And now I'd like to turn the conference over to Dana Hambly. Please go ahead.
spk10: Thank you and welcome to the National Health Investors Conference call to review the company's results for the third quarter of 2021. On the call today are Eric Mendelson, President and CEO, Kevin Pascoe, Chief Investment Officer, John Spade, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and David Travis, Chief Accounting Officer. The results as well as notice of the accessibility of this conference call on a listen-only basis were released after the market closed today in a press release that's been covered by the financial media. As a reminder, any statements in this conference call which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. NHI cautions investors that any forward-looking statements may involve risks or uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. All forward-looking statements represent NHI's judgment as of the date of this conference call. Investors are urged to carefully review various disclosures made by NHI and its periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission including the risk factors and other information disclosed in NHI's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30th, 2021. Copies of these filings are available on the SEC's website at SEC.gov or on NHI's website at NHIREAD.com. In addition, certain terms used in this call are non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations of which are provided in NHI's earnings release and related tables and schedules, which have been filed on Form 8A with the SEC. Listeners are encouraged to review those reconciliations provided in the earnings release together with all other information provided in that release. I'll now turn the call over to our CEO, Eric Mendelsohn.
spk09: Hello, and thanks for joining us today. We've been working this year to transition NHI into a stronger company entering 2022, and we have accomplished a great deal. Our portfolio optimization efforts, including dispositions, tenant transitions, and rent restructuring, will have touched more than 120 of our senior housing properties, or more than 50% of our entire portfolio. We expect these efforts to be largely concluded by the end of the first quarter of 2022. While there are many I's to be dotted and T's to be crossed, We are pleased that we have established frameworks that fundamentally transform our partnerships with Bickford and our legacy holiday portfolio. The completed and pending dispositions greatly improve the health of the Bickford and holiday portfolios, which are well positioned to participate in the recovery of senior housing that is currently underway. Starting with Bickford, we are making progress on the disposition of another subset of buildings which will reduce the size of the lease portfolio to 35 or 36 properties compared to the 48 at the beginning of the year. Following the dispositions, we plan to reset Bickford's annual cash rent to a lease coverage level that makes them a much healthier tenant financially and allows repayment of deferred rent. From an operations standpoint, We've been encouraged by the rebound in Bickford's occupancy, which increased by 280 basis points from the second quarter to the third and is up 520 basis points from the first quarter. That's more than double the industry growth rate of 210 basis points for comparable assets. Labor issues should start to subside, driven by accelerating rate growth. And Bickford's margins should recover some of the more than 800 basis points lost due to the pandemic. That is why our agreement includes resetting the lease to a fair market value after two years with a minimum floor. Kevin will provide more details in his comments. Shifting to the legacy holiday portfolio, we have disposed of nine underperforming properties and are evaluating the sale of two others. These properties had been earmarked as possible sales prior to the start of the pandemic. In fact, the pre-pandemic margins on the 11 properties were more than 1,000 basis points below the remaining 15 we continue to own. And that gap widened to over 1,500 basis points during the pandemic. With the remaining holiday properties, we are forming two separate joint ventures in RIDEA-like structures with two excellent managers that have extensive experience operating middle market independent living communities. We are excited to start a new relationship with Merrill Gardens, a well-established operator based in Seattle that will manage our six West Coast properties. We're also pleased to expand our relationship with Discovery Senior Living through the formation of a joint venture to own and operate eight to nine communities with an East Coast footprint. We are also transitioning the Vero Beach assisted living community to the Discovery Master lease. The ventures will be similarly structured with equity contributions from both operators and include value creation and operating cash flow promotes, which we think best align interests as operating performance improves. There's plenty of potential in the legacy portfolio as the pre pandemic margins were more than 900 basis points higher than current margins and we're glad to be in a position to capture that upside. In addition to participating in the operating recovery of these independent living communities, we believe that by entering into these operating joint ventures. we are better positioned strategically to grow our senior housing business with this new product offering. Our progress so far is showing results. We've completed the disposition of 16 underperforming senior housing assets for approximately 173 million. The cap rate on these sales was 3.1% and lease coverage was 0.33 times. We have targeted another 21 underperforming senior housing assets for disposition, which we estimate will generate gross proceeds of approximately 150 to 155 million with a combined NOI yield in the low single digits and very little lease coverage. We are transforming NHI into a high coverage, high quality portfolio. In other words, a jewel box. Our balance sheet is in great health as we reduced debt by $150 million during the quarter and currently have full capacity available earner revolver. Considering the cap rates for many of the senior housing asset sales we are contemplating are in the low single digits, we see a nice arbitrage opportunity as we replace them with investments at yields in the mid to high single digits. With nothing drawn on the revolver, additional proceeds coming from dispositions, and low leverage, we see little need to issue equity as we resume our external growth. Our current position reminds me of a point in time in our company's history in 2009 when we had no debt on the balance sheet and $100 million in cash. We are eager to turn the page on this chapter of our story and get back to growth with new and existing partners. While we spend most of our time talking about our assisted living and independent living operators, we want to point out the exceptional performance of our entrance fee and skilled nursing segments which represent close to 60% of our annualized cash revenue net of deferrals. We're fortunate to be in line with these best-in-class operators and they serve as a blueprint for the long-term stability and growth that we are pivoting back to as a company. I'll now turn the call over to John.
spk08: Thank you, Eric, and good afternoon, everyone. Beginning with our net income for diluted common share, for the third quarter ended September 30th, 2021, we achieved 67 cents compared to 95 cents for the same period in 2020. The year-over-year decline in net income is largely due to $6.6 million in lower rent received from holiday, $5.2 million in additional quarterly rent deferrals provided to other operators, $22.4 million in real estate impairment charges and the revenue reductions due to dispositions and mortgage repayments since the prior year's third quarter. These declines to net income were partially offset by $19.9 million in gains from the sale of real estate and revenue increases attributable to $142.2 million of investments and commitment fundings made since the third quarter of 2020. For our FFO metrics per diluted common share for the quarter ended September 30th, 2021, compared to the prior year, NAE REIT FFO decreased 26 cents to $1.16 from $1.42. And normalized FFO decreased 27 cents to $1.15 per share from $1.42. For the quarter ended September 30th, 2021, our normalized FAD declined $9.1 million year over year and by $1.7 million sequentially to $51.2 million. As I previously detailed, the year-over-year and sequential quarterly decline was driven by lower holiday rent, additional rent deferrals, dispositions and mortgage repayments offset by investments made over the prior 12 months. Reconciliations for our pro forma performance metrics can be found in our earnings release and 10Q filed this afternoon at scc.gov. Our third quarter dividend at 90 cents per share was paid on November 5th, 2021. and represents normalized FFO and FAD total payout, total dollar payout ratios of 78.6% and 80.6% respectively. As announced this afternoon, our board declared our fourth quarter dividend at 90 cents per share for shareholders of record on December 31st and payable on January 31st. Turning to the balance sheet for the quarter ended September 30th, our net debt to annualized EBITDA leverage ratio improved sequentially to 4.8 times from 5.1 times. This improvement in leverage was purposeful as the company disposed of low-yielding assets, but it's additionally reflective of the unexpected reduction in holiday rents. Our purposeful strategy means that as we enter 2022 and the clouds clear around holiday, Bickford, and other distressed relationships, we'll be in a position to quickly and accretively redeploy capital. As detailed in our cash flow statement, for the nine-month period ended September 30th, The $163.4 million in net cash flow from investing activities is capital which in large part will allow us to accretively redeploy into new investments without the need for additional equity while still staying comfortably within our stated leverage policies. Having said that, we're still not done selling low-yielding assets, which we believe we can further redeploy into additional higher-yielding investments in a relatively short period of time over the coming quarters. That's extremely good news for NHI as we enter 2022, and we look forward to next year. On October 31st, we had no amounts outstanding under our $550 million revolver and $74 million in cash. We did not issue any equity through our ATM program during the third quarter and do not expect to issue equity during the fourth quarter. We continue to have approximately $417 million in capacity available to us under our ATM program. Our 2017 $800 million revolver and term loan credit facility mature in August of next year. We're in the process of engaging our banking relationships for the re-syndication of our credit facility, and we are targeting closing the facility in the first quarter of 2022. Regarding the fourth quarter, we want to point out a few items that will impact the results. First, we sold two properties in September that contributed approximately $1 million to our third quarter cash revenue. Second, we expect that the Bickford deferrals will be $1 million higher in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter. Last, we received approximately $2.3 million in rent payments from Holiday during the third quarter, but as of today's call, we have yet to receive any payments in the fourth quarter. We continue to hold an $8.8 million Holiday security deposit, and the final recognition of the deposit will coincide with the termination of the legacy Holiday lease by foreclosure or agreement. We have made no determination as to how or if any other deposit will be applied, but we expect a resolution on the deposit in early 2022. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Kevin Pascoe to discuss our portfolio. Kevin.
spk03: Thank you, John. The last two years have obviously been challenging, but we have learned quite a bit about what it takes to be successful even in the most difficult business environments. We are using past experience of lessons learned to reposition NHI this year so that we are set up to grow with the very best partners going forward. Our needs-driven senior housing portfolio, which accounts for approximately 31% of our annualized cash revenue net of deferrals, generally experience solid occupancy gains throughout the quarter. However, margin growth has not advanced in line with historical trends in occupancy growth due primarily to increased wages for hourly staff as well as increased use of agency staffing. On a positive note, residents and their families have been sympathetic to the labor issues and in multiple instances have been receptive to increased rents to offset the wage growth. We expect that this trend coupled with the scheduled 5.9% increase in the Social Security COLO will lead to much stronger rate growth in 2022. Bigford, our largest assisted living operator, representing 14% of annualized cash revenue net of deferrals, increased quarterly occupancy by 280 basis points sequentially, but labor expenses have been a major hurdle, so we deferred 3.5 million in the third quarter. As Eric discussed, we have reached a preliminary agreement that transforms our Bigford relationship. As we work to complete several more asset sales, We have agreed to defer 4.5 million in fourth quarter rent and up to an additional 4 million in the first quarter of 2022. We are also working to restructure the leases, which we currently estimate results in annual rent of approximately $28 million. For reference, we collected approximately $7.8 million in rent from Bigford in the third quarter, and we expect to collect approximately $6.8 million in the fourth. Based on recent operating performance, this reset would improve Bickford's lease coverage after management fee and capital expenditures of 500 per unit to 1.21 times from 0.91 times. We think this cushion allows for some further near-term margin deterioration as well as potential incremental capex. Following the rent reset, Bickford will use 85% of the leased portfolio's free cash flow to service a deferral balance of approximately $26 million. There are milestones and performance incentives included in the agreement that would reduce this balance, which we view as a strong alignment of interest. After two years, Bickford's rent will be increased based on fair market value, but not be below a floor which is based on an 8% yield on the portfolio's original purchase price. We greatly value our longstanding relationship with Bickford and are hopeful these actions restore stability to this relationship for many years to come. Turning to our independent living communities, this group accounted for only 5% of our annualized cash revenue net of deferrals as we sold nine holiday properties for 120 million, which had annualized contractual rent of approximately nine million. We have targeted two more holiday properties for sale, which have annualized rent of approximately $1.8 million. In aggregate, we estimate that these 11 properties have lease coverage below 0.5 times and margins that are approximately 1500 basis points below the remaining portfolio. As Eric noted, we are in the process of transitioning the remaining properties to Merrill Gardens and Discovery, which we expect to happen in early 2022. We are excited to be partnering with these well-established operators and believe this will open up a new path of growth for NHI that supplements our triple net strategy and allows us to participate in the upside as performance recovers from historic lows. Our entrance fee communities, which account for 27% of our annualized cash revenue net of deferrals, continue to outperform the other senior housing asset classes. EBITDARM coverage excluding senior living communities increased sequentially to 1.76 times from 1.65 times. Senior living communities, which represents 19% of our cash revenue, had third quarter average occupancy of 80.4%, which was up 190 basis points from the second quarter and was actually higher than the pre-pandemic first quarter of 2022 at 80.3%. BDARM coverage through the second quarter and excluding grant funds was 1.09 times, which was down sequentially from 1.13 times. The skilled nursing portfolio, which represents 32% of annualized cash revenue net of deferrals, is anchored by NHC and the Ensign Group, who contributed 15% and 9% of annualized cash revenue, respectively. SNFI BDARM coverage for the trailing 12 months ended June 30th, was 2.8 times, including 3.82 times at NHC and 2.1 times at our other medical properties. Turning to our business development activities, year to date we have announced over 120 million of investments at a weighted average yield of nearly 9%. We did not make any new investments during the third quarter, but activity with our partners at Montecito has picked up recently, so expect to fund multiple projects before the year end and still estimate that the fund will be fully invested within two years from inception. The pipeline remains active across multiple asset classes and product types, but it has been a better seller's market, which has certainly worked to our advantage this year. As we conclude our disposition program, we expect to be more active rebuilding the pipeline in 2022. With that, I'll hand the call back over to Eric. Thank you, Kevin.
spk09: We are repositioning NHI to emerge as a stronger company going into 2022. We are making steady headway and expect that our portfolio optimization activities will be complete by the end of the first quarter of 2022. We believe that repositioning is in the best long-term interests of our stakeholders and are very optimistic about the future for several reasons. First, We fully expect that senior housing fundamentals will recover, driven in near-term by easing compensation pressure and unprecedented rent growth. Over the longer term, as the supply and demand dynamics start to tilt in our favor, we see years of consistent growth ahead in the industry. Second, we are set up for strong long-term organic growth. We expect deferral balances to start repaying in 2022 and our new joint ventures position NHI to participate directly in the upside of the senior housing recovery. Third, our low levered balance sheet will only improve as cash flow stabilizes and with plenty of access to capital, we are able to drive strong acquisitive growth, which is made more accretive as we have limited need to issue equity. Operator will now turn the line over for questions.
spk05: Thank you. If you'd like to register a question, please press the 1 followed by the 4 on your telephone. You will hear a three-tone prompt to acknowledge your request. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your registration, please press the 1 followed by the 3. If you are using a speakerphone, please lift your handset before entering your request. Once again, that's 1, 4 to register for a question. One brief moment for the first question. And we do have a question from the line of Jordan Sadler with KeyBank Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line's open.
spk04: Thanks, guys. I wanted to dig in a little bit. There's a little bit more going on this quarter than I anticipated, particularly as it related to Bickford and the rent cuts. And I was kind of curious if you could maybe walk us through – how you arrived at what looks to be about an 18% rent cut for Bickford, and correct me if I'm wrong there, at this point in time, and when that sort of goes into effect exactly. Thank you.
spk03: Sure.
spk02: Hey, Jordan, it's Kevin.
spk03: I would tell you that we looked at the portfolio as currently constructed, but then also looking at the dispositions that we're evaluating here over the next, three to six months and the underlying NOI for those buildings and what they could support both now and then with those buildings removed and then from there looking at again what they could support now and projecting forward on some improvement over time where we think they would have a reasonable amount of cash flow above and beyond that to continue to service the Deferred rent amounts. So we're looking at as a starting point in place cash flow for the buildings and what we think they can support subtracting out the buildings that we're looking to Move away from and then ultimately what does that new portfolio look like and then then still being able to service that that rent payment along the way to the extent maybe some of those buildings take a little longer to sell or there's some new ones that that come in or go out so to speak so We think we have a good strategy in terms of which ones are moving. Again, those can move maybe one or two different buildings here and there, but by and large, the underlying portfolio can support the rent number based on current performance. So again, that was kind of the starting point, and then looking for them to continue to grow occupancy margins to settle out a little bit, where we have seen some wage pressure here and there across the portfolio, not only with Bickford, But, you know, if that continues or if that starts to settle out, then they should be able to start to service that deferred rent.
spk04: Okay. And then just how did you arrive at the degree of the rent cut? Was it just based on pro forma lease service coverage ratio? were you know i'm trying to just understand the delta between the 46 million on page um uh i'm not sure what page four of the deck here uh pay you know 46 million to the 37 7. right yeah so the the 37 7 that you mentioned is the
spk03: portfolio minus the seven buildings that we're looking at disposition currently. And then furthermore, the rent cut to 28 million is again what we believe the portfolio can service today based on current NY. So we're expecting that step down from the 46 really the 37 to the 28 beginning next year. And then after 24 months, that rent will then be reset to a, what we believe should be a more stabilized portfolio at that time.
spk04: It's a minimum of an eight, right? On the, on the basis in those assets. Correct. Yeah. On the original basis, not the depreciated basis. Do you know, do you know what that is offhand?
spk03: Well, I can give you some goalposts. Based on the disposition of the seven, that number would be between $32 and $33 million. Again, if there's some additional sales along the way or if a building turns and we elect not to sell it, that number will change a little bit. But ultimately, according to the plan that we have right now, it would be in that $32 to $33 million. That's the 8% floor. Correct.
spk04: Okay. Okay. And then just on the JV agreements, what is the base management fee or in place, you know, and or the in place NOI from these assets? I tried to sort of back into it based on sort of the lease coverage, the LSCR. and what the prior rent was, and I got to like a $15 million number for NOI, but I could use maybe a little bit of help trying to understand how we get, you know, we were at $21 million for these 14, 15 assets that are going to the JV. Where does that go kind of, you know, Gen 1?
spk03: You're asking what's the management fee?
spk04: Plus the NOI, yeah. And the way the structure of the JV, I mean, what the percentages are, I'm just trying to understand what these numbers are going to look like compared to the previous in-place rent.
spk03: Yeah, well, I guess I would say to that end, we're... With most companies and most management agreements we're seeing, there's a 5% management fee. But there's also incentives that get put in there along the way for certain performance hurdles. And we want to make sure that the managers are properly incentivized. But the base fee would be around that 5%.
spk04: And am I about right on the in-place NOI, that $15 million?
spk03: You're looking at for the remaining 15 buildings?
spk04: Yeah, yeah. Page six, you've got the pro forma LSCR of 0.73 times, and I'm basically assuming that you're using the 0.73 lease service coverage ratio off of a rent of combined $21 million, $21.4 million on the two portfolios combined.
spk03: Yeah, we'd be looking at it in a while a little bit higher than that.
spk08: I mean, you're... Hey, Jordan, we don't mean to be cagey, but, you know, we're going to go through a little bit of a transition with the properties. We'll give you... This is John. We want to give the street a good set of guidance in February. But keep in mind, there's going to be some transition. And then in addition to that, you know, we gave you some idea that in the past, you know, the numbers we had given you represented roughly the NOI from these properties based upon the net deferrals before the properties were transferred to Welltower and Atria. But there's $6 to $8 million of NOI upside in these properties if we can get to pre-pandemic levels. But there'll be a little bit of movement on that as we get there.
spk04: When would the transition date be effective, essentially, for these two portfolios?
spk03: So this is Kevin again. We're going to target the first of the year. Okay. Any transition, you know, there's movement, but at the end of the day, that's what our goal is. Okay.
spk09: Thank you, guys. Thank you. Thanks, Jordan.
spk05: Our next question is from Juan Sanabria with BMO. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
spk07: Hi, good morning, or sorry, good afternoon. Just on the, Jordan, it's been a long day. On Jordan's question on holiday, could you just talk a little bit about the structure in terms of the upside? Think of it similar to the way you guys, Bigfoot was more of a triple net than a true shop structure, and what's the ownership split between you and Merrill Gardens and Discovery on that venture.
spk02: Sure, this is Kevin.
spk03: So this one's going to be different than Bigford in that, while NHI will still be the large majority owner, not going to be a lease in place like there was with Bigford. There we had a separate opco propco split. Here we're anticipating what we'd refer to as a back-to-back management agreement. So we're partners with them on the real estate and really the whole venture together. The ownership between Discovery and Merrill is a little bit different. We're not yet at a place where we're ready to talk about specific numbers, but Suffice it to say, it'll be a meaningful amount to each one of those organizations that they're putting in and we're gonna have appropriate incentives and carrots for these properties to perform. But we would cage it as, or couch it, I should say, as a meaningful amount to each one of them and feel like it provides good alignment for the venture we're doing. And the point of clarity is that they are both cutting a check to come into the venture with us.
spk08: Okay.
spk07: And can you comment on your search?
spk08: I was going to just add, you know, these will be shop portfolios. They will, you know, we'll structure them with some synthetic debt. And then they'll each own, you know, some portion of the equity. We think we know what those numbers are. We're not yet ready to share that with you. You know, but, you know, the vast majority, over 90% of the capital will still be provided by us.
spk07: Okay. And can you comment on your confidence or lack thereof in ability to get to the deferred or, sorry, the unpaid rents? by Holiday and the credit behind that lease with Welltower?
spk09: Hey Juan, this is Eric. That is obviously a sensitive legal topic, so I hesitate to speculate on an earnings call, but just know that we are focused on recovering that and that the balance sheet information we receive from Atria indicates that those funds are accruing on the building's balance sheets.
spk07: Okay. Okay. And then just on the going back to Bickford, is it right to think that you It sounds to me that you have decided to cut rents based on current performance and cash flows despite visibility in the upside for these next two years with maybe the offset that you get repaid the amount that's been deferred rather than giving them a lower coverage day one and kind of maybe sacrificing that repayment of deferrals but not giving kind of a two-year rent cut. Is that the right way to think about it?
spk09: That's a way to think about it. The reason we did that is because the repayment of the deferrals will most likely be lumpy and dependent on the recovery of the buildings, the margins from the labor expenses, and we wanted a rent number that we could depend on that was backed up by coverage. We think it's important to show investors that our leases have good coverage and that the rents are solid. And then finally, as John said, we're endeavoring to give you guidance in our February earnings call. So all of that went into the thinking on how we structured this.
spk07: And just last question for me. Can you give us any sense of, I know that there's still a lot of moving pieces about what the pro forma dividend coverage will be kind of come, I guess, at the end of the first quarter 22 when this is all kind of washed out in the comfort level there?
spk08: This is John. I'd say we have a very high degree of confidence in our payout ratio being where we think it will be, which is say low 80s to even below 80%. A lot of that's going to have to do with getting these joint ventures closed and temporarily maybe some transition costs that show up in the first quarter. And we just can't give you guidance on that just yet. The fourth quarter, though, you'll note that we've talked a little bit about little heavier deferrals in the fourth quarter. So, you know, you should, you know, expect some, you know, increase in the payout ratio as a result of that. So don't be surprised by that. But we have a high degree of confidence that it's going to be very short-lived.
spk05: Thank you. Our next question is from Rich Anderson with SMBC. Please go ahead. Your line's open.
spk11: Thanks. Good afternoon. So, you know, listening to other calls this earnings season, particularly from your larger cap peers, you know, there's a lot more enthusiasm about the future in the senior housing space. And I'm curious if you would be having similar undertones to your tone in And if we're really specifically talking about very company-specific issues that you perhaps missed in the underwriting or whatever, but what do you think happened to have this have such a, you know, have been such a tough path? And it's been tough for everybody, but, you know, there's a lot more enthusiasm away from you today from other REITs. What do you think it is, you know, about your specific situation? Go ahead.
spk09: Good marketing and good voice coaches.
spk11: Is that really your final answer?
spk09: Rich, you know, it's not lost on us that there's a lot of cheerleaders in this business. I think if you read the transcripts from our prepared remarks, you'll see optimism there. You'll see the way that we structured the the restructuring of Bickford and of Holiday, that it allows us to participate in the upside. All of that we believe will bode well for 2022 and beyond. So there's optimism there, you know, and I would also point with a yellow highlighter to the part in our prepared remarks where Bickford is knocking it out of the park. They are leading in terms of occupancy way ahead of Nick, way ahead of other REIT shop portfolios. They're in the 80s. A lot of portfolios are still in the 70s. So don't let my monotone voice convince you that I'm not enthusiastic. I am. And we're trying to signal to the market and to the analyst communities that we have increased confidence in 2022. We declared a dividend this quarter. We didn't wait, as we have been. We've signaled we want to give guidance for 2022 in February, where we didn't give guidance this year. Our payout ratio is adjusted, and we think we got that right. We think that the amount that we cut is gives us the breathing room to do these dispositions and rights the ship, if you will, for future dividend growth. So there's a lot of good optimistic signals in our prepared remarks and in the progress report that we also distributed this morning as part of our release You know, we feel like we've made good progress on restructuring all of the things that needed to be restructured.
spk11: Okay. Well, you know, we appreciate the candor for sure, so don't take the question the wrong way. Now, the other thing is, you know, rate growth, and you said it yourself, unprecedented rate growth. Okay. Does a lot of that or most of that hit in the very early part, maybe January 1 of next year? I'm just curious if you can outline the timing of when offers start going out and when we could start seeing some of that. Sure.
spk02: Hey, Rich. It's Kevin.
spk03: I would say that it'll be over the course of the year. But yes, most operators target the beginning of the year. Some do it on the anniversary date of the resident, but that's probably the exception more so than the rule. Most of what we're seeing will be more first quarter. We've heard a range anywhere from 5% to 10% even. I would say most of our operating partners are going to be asking more in that 5% to 6% range, which again, that's going to step up rents to try and cover the labor that's going out. We've also heard that there's going to be some groups that are looking at more of almost like a labor surcharge to help cut down on the amount of overhead that's continuing to build here. So there is some, we think there's a good possibility that there will be a good rate growth for the year. It's an effort to mitigate the expenses. We do think also that if they can get people to come back to the workforce and they can mitigate some of the agency in overtime, that'll help. But the fact of the matter is wages are up. So that's going to be a little bit of a headwind still, but the rate should help keep that abated to some degree.
spk11: Is it true that residents are like saying, yeah, I'll pay you more to cover your labor costs? I mean, it seems like such a nice thing to do, but is that really happening or is that almost, you know, that's the market and so they're just having to pay it or going to have to pay it?
spk03: Well, I'd say it's probably a blend of the two. It's people aren't signing up to get charged more. At the same time, when you have these resident council meetings and they understand and they talk to family members, they understand what's going on. They see it elsewhere. They understand that prices are going up. So they're not cheerleading you, but they understand it. And it is the market. So to the extent that there are some people that are doing the 8%, 9%, 10% to the extent you're doing 5%, 6%, 7%, which would still be considered exceptional. That's perhaps a little more palatable.
spk11: Kevin, my last question is when you came up with the Bickford restructuring after first the sales and then the right size of coverage and everything, all the steps that you went through, what did you assume in rate growth in underwriting that decision?
spk03: They're going to be in line with what we just told you, that 5% to 6% is what we're expecting. As we've talked about, the wage pressure is still very real. So we also said that we expect, not expect, but we allowed for some near-term margin compression as we go through the winter months and get into the first quarter. So they're going to be in line with what we're seeing from our other operating companies. but we're also trying to give them some wiggle room, so to speak, to start paying back these deferred balances. So that's going to be the upside that we capture to the extent we did cut a little low. It just means we get paid back a little faster.
spk11: I'm sorry, one more. I know the deferred balance for Bickford is $26 million, I think is right. What's the total balance? deferred balance.
spk03: The 26 is going to be the anticipated total, so that includes the first quarter.
spk08: Rich, we're well over $40 million, including some other notes that we've not taken into income, such as the second mortgage on the six properties that we sold to Bigford earlier this year. And as Kevin mentioned, that includes what we expect to defer in the fourth and the first quarter of next year. So what we're doing is we're using some of those deferrals as a performance incentive as well. They may hit certain hurdles, and we'll forgive a portion of those deferrals. But when you look at those coverage ratios that we also displayed in our forecast to you, in our presentation to you today also. Keep in mind we're using $500 per unit capex. We think their actuals will be a little heavier. And we don't wanna have to come back and talk to you again about another rent cut. And so that was part and parcel of our discussion and where we settled on. But when they do have excess cash flow, we do expect to be able to collect it and collect it through these deferrals.
spk11: Okay, and then when you start reporting, FFO in 2023 and so on. I mean, you could have big, big growth numbers. You have to be careful about how you communicate that, I guess, right? That's a problem.
spk08: Yeah, we'll have to be very careful about that. We'll have to help you with bridging through that. We'll have other things that will make its way down to the FAD line, including $8.8 million in deposits that we hold on holiday. And we fully expect to be able to collect rent on holiday. So I don't want you to think that we're sitting here saying that that's not going to happen. So we're going to have some discussions about that coming up. So once we get through this period of time and we get into those discussions, that's another spot where you'll see some lumpiness. So yes, we'll have to help you bridge all that to get to a stabilized number.
spk11: Well, at least it's interesting. Thanks, guys. Thanks, Rich.
spk05: Our next question is from Daniel Bernstein with Capital One. Please go ahead. The line's open. Hi. Good evening.
spk06: I just wanted to go back to the holiday JVs and just kind of understand how much deferred CapEx might be there. And I'm sure you're still figuring this out, but kind of how we should think about your CapEx obligations as part of those JVs.
spk02: Sure. Hey, Dan. It's Kevin. I would tell you that
spk03: generally speaking the buildings have been maintained that said as we've seen in the portfolio and not unique to this group that you know capex has been a little or say maintenance has been a little deferred just you know maybe some carpets need to be replaced or walls painted so forth you know so on and so forth we are as a part of our capitalization though for each one of these joint ventures allowing for you know, pretty sizable amount of CapEx to be put into each of the two portfolios. So we'll capture that on the front end, make sure that these are up to speed in terms of making good first impressions and for the new operating partners to be able to sell into the market.
spk06: Okay. And then I wanted to kind of understand on holiday information, How much rent was actually booked in 3Q? I thought it was, I saw $600,000, but I just wanted to make sure I understood what was being booked in FFO and FAD, given that you didn't use any of that $8.8 million, or didn't draw down much of that $8.8 million deposit.
spk08: Yeah, so, you know, Dan, we originally had $10.6 million in deposit. $600,000 of that was used in the third quarter. FAD that was recognized was $2.3 million in the third quarter. Okay. So that includes a little piece of the deposit that I just mentioned to you.
spk06: Right. And then just going back to the JVs and the pipeline and kind of expectations for investments in 2022, do you – in almost – I mean, you've done some kind of shop-like JVs before on a small scale, but this seems like you're much more positive about the recovery in the space and maybe would use these JVs as a, I guess, a platform to increase the amount of RIDEA-like assets in your portfolio. So outside of the assets that you're donating to these JVs, are there other assets that you've identified within your portfolio you might donate to those JVs and then are you thinking about in 2022 expanding the JVs through acquisitions?
spk09: Good question, Dan. This is Eric. You're right. We're excited about this and it does have potential as a new platform. Most of our other properties are still in triple net leases, so it might not be possible to put them into the JV, the current operators have something to say about that. But it certainly could be a platform for growth and for new acquisitions. And we're hopeful that'll be the case. Okay.
spk06: All right. I'll hop off. Thanks for taking the questions.
spk08: Thanks, Dan.
spk05: And we have a question from Teo Okusanya with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.
spk01: Your line is open. Good evening, everyone. I just wanted to follow up on Rich's question about Bigford. So, Kev, I think you gave some general guidelines around, you know, assumptions that were made about the portfolio recovery as it pertains to, you know, OPEX labor, possibly also kind of rental growth. Could you talk a little bit more about just other assumptions you may be making that led you to feel confident that the way this is being structured, that they will be able to pay the newly established rent rates and as well as all the deferrals?
spk03: Sure. This is Kevin. Well, we mentioned in our prepared remarks what our collections from Bickford were for the third quarter and what we expect for the fourth quarter, which again triangulate that $28 million run rate that we went through. Over the last few months, we've seen them be at the highest level that they've been in history in terms of the amount of agency and overtime usage and their labor costs. So even if they hold steady, we feel reasonably good about their ability to continue to service the rent going forward into next year. So based on current occupancy, current rates without additional rate growth, we believe they should be able to service the rent, the $20 million rent number. So getting rid of the buildings, their ability to execute on limiting agency and overtime and getting labor under control, The number of things that we've mentioned will contribute to them being able to increase their NOI over time. To date, we've seen them increase occupancy between 50 and 100 basis points a month. We use that as also a signal in terms of how we are looking at the next 12 to 24 months and how we are looking at their opportunity to increase their NOI. So they have a lot of factors going on, but again, I think the key here is that based on the current trailing information that we have, and even where we're seeing labor and rates today, we believe they should be able to service that rent payment, and then assuming they can get the labor piece under control and have occupancy and rate growth, then that's what's gonna be able to help the deferral component.
spk01: Gotcha, okay, that's helpful. And then, again, pardon me because I'm a little rusty. I've been out of the game for a couple of months. But the smaller tenants you used to have in your portfolio that were kind of in transition, they were in lease-up, there were a small handful of them, you know, smaller Radea-type transactions. I think some of them may even have been triple-deck transactions. Could you just kind of talk about what's happening with those names? Because, again, pre-pandemic, you know, occupancies were still in lease-up mode. They've obviously gone down since then. Like that small pool of tenants, is there anything there that we should be thinking about that may be a potential drag to earnings going forward, just kind of given the prolonged pandemic?
spk09: That's a great question, Tayo. This is Eric, and welcome back to the game. Thank you. The way we took a hard look at some of those properties and the way we thought about it is here's a nugget of value that isn't generating any NOI. Is it going to generate NOI in the near future? Because if it's not, we happen to have this unique situation where the disposition market is very robust. and you can turn that underperforming building into cash and either pay down debt or reinvest it in something that is going to give you immediate NOI and returns. So several of those buildings ended up on our disposition list and you can see what that looks like on page seven. of the slide deck that we added to our web page. And granted, after we did that underwriting and re-underwriting, there were a couple of buildings that we believe in, in markets that we believe in, that we're going to be patient and hold on to them to experience the recovery. But there's some that they weren't doing well before the pandemic. They're not doing well during the pandemic. but they can fetch a very good price, so that's our approach to those buildings.
spk08: Thank you. This is John. On slide seven, you'll see there are 21 assets. Yeah. Yeah, see that line there in the in progress line? So those 21 assets include, you know, say two holiday assets, not yet disposed, seven Bigford assets that we talked about on other slides, and then approximately 12 of these other assets that we've been talking about that gets to your question regarding smaller tenants.
spk01: Great. Thank you.
spk08: You're welcome.
spk05: And there are no further questions at this time.
spk09: Thank you, everyone, for your time and attention today, and we'll see some of you tomorrow at NAE REIT.
spk05: That concludes the call for today. We thank you for your participation. Now, please disconnect your lines.
Disclaimer

This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

-

-