Suncor Energy Inc.

Good day and welcome to the Suncor Energy Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session you will need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker, Suncor Energy's Vice President, Mr. Troy Little. Mr. Little, the floor is yours.

Thank you, Operator, and good morning. Welcome to Suncor Energy's Second Quarter earnings call. Please note that today's comments contain forward-looking information. Actual results may differ materially from the expected results because of various risk factors and assumptions that are described in our Second Quarter earnings release as well as in our current annual information form, both of which are available on CDAR, EDGAR, and our website, suncor.com. Certain financial measures referred to in these comments are not prescribed by Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. For a description of these financial measures, please see our Second Quarter earnings release. We will start with comments from Rich Krueger, President and Chief Executive Officer, followed by Chris Smith, Suncor's Chief Financial Officer. Also on the call are Peter Zebedee, Executive Vice President, oil sands, and Shelley Powell, Senior Vice President, Operational Improvement and Support Services. Following the formal remarks, we'll open up the call to questions. Now I'll hand it over to Rich to share his comments.

Thanks, Troy. Good morning. Following a strong first quarter, our second quarter was about execution and momentum. Execution of major turnaround activities and momentum in targeted improvement areas. Chris will detail the quarter here in a few moments, but I'll start with some color commentary with the beginning with a recap of our May 21st investor day. May 21st was about unveiling today's Suncor and its ambitions, a company committed to consistently deliver high performance. May 21st was also about backing up our words with a growing list of proof points to build trust and credibility, trust in our company and credibility in our management. In terms of key messages, I'll highlight three. First, with across the board improvements and 100 plus thousand barrels a day of increased production, we intend to grow free funds flow by greater than $3 billion per year by 2026. Second, aligned with stronger performance, we're now allocating 75% of excess funds to share buybacks and have increased our net debt target from moving to 100%. Third, with growth from within existing assets and a wealth of long-term internal options, there will be no significant capital directed to new Richmond development in the next five years. Lastly, on May 21st, we discussed culture, competitive, results-oriented, high performance, a culture being institutionalized within Suncor today. I'll turn to the second quarter starting with safety, where we continue to achieve exceptional results, particularly impressive with high turnaround activity and seasonally high number of contractors on site. Our safety performance is a credit to our people, processes, priorities, and site leadership. I'll move on to reliability. Crystal detailed the second quarter, I'd like to reflect on the first half. Refining throughput in the first half is 443,000 barrels a day, up 62,000 barrels a day, or 16% from the first half of last year. It represents our best first half in company history and our second best second quarter in company history. The results were driven by a 95% overall utilization rate in the first half versus 82% in the first half of last year. Achieved despite major turnarounds at both Sarnia and Montreal, Edmonton, our moneymaker, had its best ever utilization of 107% in the first half. Refined product sales in the first half were 588,000 barrels a day, up 57,000 barrels a day, or 11% from the first half of last year. Again, the best first half in company history and the best second quarter in history. The first and second quarters were -to-back record highs for refined product sales. Upstream production, the first half, 803,000 barrels a day, up 61,000 barrels a day, or 8% versus the first half of last year. Again, the best first half in the company history and second best second quarter in our history. Multiple asset-specific records were set, but I want to highlight one particular noteworthy accomplishment, upgrade utilization at 94% in the first half with a very impressive 99% at the base plant, despite turnarounds completed in the second quarter. And for context on our upgrade, our op-ex on upgrade are about $6 to $7 a barrel Canadian. These behemoths print money. We get a value uplift of about $15 a barrel US, so every 1% increase in utilization adds about $20 million a year in free funds flow. Last year, we had a record annual utilization of 92% for the whole year, and at the first half of this year, we're at 94% despite the syncrude turnaround activity. So summary, our first half reliability was exceptional. Again, it's a credit to our people, their expertise, their focus, teamwork, and determination. Profitability. Chris will cover overall profitability shortly. I'd like to comment on one aspect of it, cost management. In the first half of 2024, total OS and G, all in top to bottom, $6.6 billion. Down 270 million or 4% versus the first half of last year. That's positive enough. However, in the first half, as I mentioned, upstream production was 61,000 barrels a day higher. Refining throughput, 62,000 barrels a day higher, and refined product sales, 57,000 barrels a day higher than the first half of last year. Higher absolute volumes, lower absolute costs, operating leverage. In fact, every segment of our business, upstream, downstream corporate operated at lower absolute and or unit costs in the first half of this year versus the same period last year. Every segment. Cost management is about discipline and accountability, attention to detail, a mindset that every $6.6 billion matters, a checkbook-like mentality. At today's SunCorp, we don't spend money like it's our own. We spend it like it's someone else's, and we are accountable for every dollar we spend. A disciplined, determined, cost-conscious culture. I'll move to the second quarter. During our May 21st review and on previous earnings calls, we detailed numerous improvement plans. I'll provide an update on a few this morning, starting with turnarounds. I previously described or stated that the second quarter would be our biggest turnaround quarter in 2024 with about 80% of the year's activity planned. Recall, we spend about $1.2 billion per year on turnarounds across the upstream and downstream. In North America, we have not benchmarked well on both cost and schedule. In the third quarter of last year, we formed a dedicated turnaround organization and assigned ELT-level accountability with Shelly Powell and Dave Oldreef. So the second quarter is complete. How did we do? Four big events, two upstream, Syncrude-based plant, two downstream, Sarnia, and Montreal. We completed in aggregate all of our turnarounds on budget in a whopping 10% shorter in duration. 10% equates to roughly 20 days, eight days of additional downstream throughput, 12 days of additional upstream production. At Sarnia, $150 million event, the largest in its history, and was $5 million under budget. Montreal, a $32 million event, completed in 48 days, 13 days ahead of schedule, and $7 million under budget. And our post turnaround capacity at Montreal has been 105% of nameplate. Syncrude, $450 million gross event, the 8.3 Coker was complete in 57 days, nine days less than our previous best ever. Base plant, $370 million work scope, completed on budget and five days ahead of schedule. Our teams delivered across the board, safety, cost, schedule, and then restart. The impact, we added nearly $20 million in free funds flow in the second quarter versus our budgeted plan performance. How did we do this? Benchmark targets, risk-based work selection, quality planning and execution, clarity, focus, accountability, and determination. Internally, 2023 was about achieving stability and predictability in turnaround performance. 2024 has been about improving work scope and duration. You may recall on May 21, Dave outlined capital cost reduction target of $225 to $250 million per year in turnarounds by year-end 2026. 2024 has provided us another proof point through improved work scope and shorter duration. Our next target now is extended intervals between turnarounds. I'll move to the second area of targeted improvement, mining. Peter said it much more eloquently than I did on May 21 or than I will, but our mining strategy in a nutshell is fewer trucks, bigger trucks, autonomous trucks, operated better, maintained cheaper. We've said before we have 55 new 400-ton trucks on order arriving and they will replace twice as many smaller, less efficient third-party trucks. The first 22 are in operation, that's six more than our last call. 15 more will arrive at Fort Hills through November and the final 18 will be at Base Plant in the fourth quarter of this year and the first quarter of next year. Last week I sat behind the wheel of one of these bad boys at Fort Hills and I've got to tell you, I was ready to drive it into the mine, but sadly Peter concluded I wasn't qualified. Recall in total these 55 new trucks will lower our overall corporate break even by saving more than $300 million a year in operating costs. We talked about autonomous previously. Our fleet conversion continues at Base Plant. Today we have 70 large haul trucks operating autonomously, that's 14 more than our last call. By the end of the year we'll be at 91. Our North Steep Bank mine, the ore movements are now fully autonomous and Millennium is ramping up. We are moving 80% of all base mine ore autonomously now. Our original target was 100% by year end. We will beat that target. Savings $1 million per year per truck plus productivity gain. In total $175 million annually by 2026 with expanded autonomous operations as outlined in our May 21st review. You may have noticed we've had increased commentary lately on in situ. We have achieved growth with back to back record quarters. In fact, we've set record quarters four of the last seven in our in situ operations. An example at Firebag, we're up essentially 10,000 barrels a day year on year with no growth investment. At today's prices, that's more than $100 million per year in additional free funds. So how are we doing this? Steam reliability, produced water piping, site water management, and infield drilling SOR management. Again, attention to detail. Firebag is our lowest cost, most profitable asset with growth potential. I was on site at Firebag in June. What did I see? I saw a team focused on facility utilization and low cost de-bottlenecking. The latest example I'll share is a $1 million modification to add diluent stripping capacity to increase bitumen production, adding a fifth pressure safety valve adjacent to the existing This simple add one valve will increase bitumen rates by three to five thousand barrels a day per year. I saw pictures of this work early this morning. The new equipment being installed could fit in the back of my son's pickup truck. And the best part, this modification will be operational this month. A $1 million investment will deliver an additional $50 million per year in free funds. This example is representative of the focus within our operations across the company today. A laser-like focus on asset utilization, industrial engineering, challenging historic norms, testing facility limits, and safely modifying operating parameters. Identifying opportunities, capturing value, then immediately asking what's next. The result is low cost or no cost barrels, free barrels upstream and downstream. So whether it's turnaround execution, mining improvements, in situ growth or other areas, these are tangible examples of today's SunCore. Focused, competitive, results oriented. With that, I'll turn it over to Chris.

Great, thanks Rich and good morning everyone. I'll now provide a brief overview of the financial and operating performance in the second quarter. Beginning first with the business environment in the second quarter, which continued to remain very robust. Crude oil prices improved across the board versus the first quarter. With WTI averaging US $81 a barrel, light heavy differential narrowing by US $6 a barrel to average $14 a barrel. And the synthetic premium improving by US $10 a barrel, averaging a $3 premium to WTI. On the refining side, 211 cracking margins decreased slightly with softening of diesel cracks partially offset by strengthening gasoline cracks. Our 5221 refining index was US $26.70 a barrel, which is about $9 a barrel below Q1. Driven primarily by strong crude oil pricing resulting in higher feedstock costs along with softer cracking margins. As Rich noted in his comments, we continue to see strong operational performance across the board. Along with strong turnaround performance in the quarter, SunCore's upstream delivered production of 771,000 barrels per day in the quarter, including 55,000 barrels per day of production in our E&P segment, and record second quarter oil sands production of 716,000 barrels per day, which included record quarterly production at Firebag of 234,000 barrels per day. Fort Hills also had another strong quarter, producing 167,000 barrels per day. And consistent with our original plan outlined in the fall of 2022 and our current annual production guidance, production in the second half 2024 is expected to be lower than the first half as we will be moving more overburden as we open up the north pit. Overall, we remain very pleased with the progress and the focus of the Fort Hills team on delivering against our improvement plan. Total internal synthetic crude oil and bitumen transfers averaged 63,000 barrels per day in Q2, demonstrating our ability to leverage our physical integration to maximize value and mitigate the impacts of turnarounds. This included 45,000 barrels per day of bitumen transferred from Fort Hills to base plant up here. Now, with respect to the downstream, refining utilization was an impressive 92% in the second quarter, including impacts of planned turnarounds at Sarnia and Montreal. With the refining network running at over 100% utilization following completion of those turnarounds, this supported refined product sales of 595,000 barrels per day, surpassing the previous record set last quarter by 14,000 barrels per day. Downstream margin capture was also an impressive 99% in the quarter on a life-o basis when compared to Suncor's 5221 refining index. On the back of this strong operational performance, disciplined cost and capital management, and a supportive business environment, Suncor delivered another quarter of solid financial results, generating $3.4 billion in adjusted funds from operations, or $2.65 per share. In the first half, that translates into $6.6 billion in adjusted funds from operations, or $5.11 per share. Our laser focus on cost continued with total operating, selling, and general expenses of $3.2 billion in the quarter, which is down over $250 million from Q1. Second quarter costs were essentially flat with Q2 2023 when adjusting for the restructuring charge taken last year related to our organizational downsizing. And at the same time, delivering 29,000 barrels per day more upstream production and 36,000 barrels per day more downstream throughput. As Rich said earlier, that's what we call operating leverage. We also had a decrease in non-cash operating working capital in the quarter of approximately $400 million, primarily driven by higher accounts payable as well as timing of commodity tax and royalty payments. As for capital, it was $2 billion in the quarter, driven primarily by planned turnaround and maintenance activities as outlined by Rich across the assets, as well as continuing work on key economic projects like the base plant cogeneration project and the Fort Hills North Pit extension. And our capital program remains on plan for the year. As a result, we generated $1.4 billion of free funds flow, or $1.5 per share in the quarter, and aligned with our revised capital allocation framework announced in May, returned $1.5 billion or $1.19 per share to our shareholders, including $698 million in dividends plus $825 million in share repurchases. For the first half, that means we've already returned $2.5 billion to our shareholders this year via dividends and buybacks. And as of this call, year to date, we have bought back over 2% of our shares. Our net debt ended the quarter at just under $9.1 billion, which is down $500 million versus the end of prior quarter, and also included a $100 million increase from changes in foreign exchange on our US dollar denominated debt. This reduction is consistent with our plans to continue to reduce net debt toward our $8 billion target as we laid out at our recent investor day. The second quarter was a very strong one from every perspective. Safety, operations, cost and capital discipline, and financial performance, resulting in strong financial returns for our shareholders, and which is a reflection of the continued focus and execution by the teams across the business. Looking forward, the Suncor team is fully focused on delivering the improvements laid out in our May 21 investor update, and as can be seen by our second quarter results, accelerating that plan wherever possible and driving shareholder value. And with that, I'll hand it back over to Rich.

Okay, a couple comments before we get to your questions. First, full year guidance. Second quarter is complete. It's halftime, and Team Suncor is looking good, folks. Upstream production, we are tracking above the high end of our guidance. Refining throughput, we are tracking above the high end of guidance. Refined product sales, again, tracking above the high end of guidance. OS and G and CAPEX, we are tracking within or better than guidance. Now that said, we know we've got a second half to go, and we're going to play it out till the final whistle. We've repeatedly stated that today's Suncor is a new Suncor. Strategy changes, structural and cultural changes, tangible improvement plans, and performance proof points, lots of them. We have a clear, comprehensive roadmap and a determination to win. Personally, I come from a long line of hardworking, early to bed, early to rise farmers. And at the crack of dawn, my dad would often say, get up, son, you make hay while the sun shines. Well, the sun is shining on this company, and we plan to make hay in the second half of the year. With that, I'll turn it over to Troy.

Thank you, Rich. I'll turn the call back to the operator to take some questions.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 1-1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, press star 1-1 again. One moment while we compile the Q&A roster. And our first question will come from the line of Greg Pardee with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Thanks. Thanks. Good morning, and thanks for a very energetic and detailed rundown. I was hoping to come back to the turnaround that as you laid out went extremely well. But Rich, could you or the team maybe point towards some specific examples as to what you're doing differently now that are working?

Absolutely, Greg. Thanks. I'm going to turn it over to Shelley Powell because Shelley along with Dave are really the ones who are the prime movers driving the performance improvement here. Shelley, you want to offer some comments about what's different?

Yeah, absolutely. Love to talk about turnaround. So I think as Dave mentioned during the May 21 investor day and then Rich reiterated this morning, certainly improving our turnaround competitiveness is a major opportunity for us, and we know this because we have the benchmark front and center. And when we look at those benchmarks, what we see is an opportunity to both shorten the duration of our events, they're too long, and also improve our overall cost performance and bring costs down. So to answer your question, maybe let me give you an example in each of these areas of some of the things we're doing differently. So first, the biggest lever when it comes to shortening events is quite simply to do less work. And when we look in the past, some of our own inspection processes and standards were preventing us from doing this. It required us to open and inspect certain pieces of equipment at very specific and defined time intervals, regardless of how that piece of equipment might have been used. So as a bit of an analogy, maybe think of taking your car in for an oil change every four months, regardless of how often you drove it. So now what we're doing is taking a much more specific approach, looking at each piece of equipment, looking at how it was operated, the conditions that it was exposed to, and then really deciding on the best inspection approach, up to and including really kind of to inspect this equipment offline and keep it out of the turnaround window entirely. So this is a new approach to what we call risk-based inspection. And it's allowed us to take a fair amount of work out of the turnaround without adding any additional risk. That's been a big win for us. Maybe a second example on the cost reduction side. This is an area where technology has really helped us. In our spring events, we used drones to complete refractory and stack inspections that were up at higher elevations. In just one of our events, this reduced and eliminated close to 3,000 hours that would have traditionally gone to building scaffold to get up to those heights. So this is an example that I think really delivers on all fronts. First of all, it means fewer people in our units, fewer exposure hours. So from a safety perspective, we really like that. It means reducing overhead costs. And as we get more efficient on this type of routine inspection over the long term, we also have the ability to shorten events. So now that we've got these benchmarks in front of us, we know exactly where to focus, and that's what we're doing.

Thanks, Shelley. Okay. Yeah, understood. Now, thanks for that. And maybe just to completely shift gears, you know, Rich, you talked about a number of the assets, you know, firebag base operations and so on. With Syncrude, there's been good success, I think, with the bidirectional pipelines. But are there any further synergies that you see there on a go-forward basis?

I think there are, Greg. In fact, I'd say broadly, we see synergies across the entirety of our asset base. And now with Suncor being in the operating position with Syncrude, the natural network of people and sharing of ideas is just more, it's real time. And we've moved people into the Syncrude operation and out of the Syncrude operation into our other business. And so that network of expertise keeps expanding, and that creates synergies at a fundamental operating level with safety. The bidirectional pipelines certainly have helped there. But I think we're seeing synergies across the board. Peter, do you have anything else you'd add, a specific example? Well, I think certainly,

Greg, you know, we look at Ford Hills and Aurora and their proximity. I mean, you can throw a baseball between the two sites, so there's some obvious synergies in terms of us operating both of those assets that we're looking to do. But maybe just to reinforce Rich's comments earlier, you know, regardless of how close the assets are, we believe our competitive differentiator really is the connectedness of our site. So whether that's, you know, Ford Hills to the base plant, Syncrude and Firebag Connects, et cetera, we're really looking to optimize and improve those as we go forward.

And I think, Greg, I'd just add to that. You're seeing that in the upgrade or utilization, where previously Syncrude, as an example, was mine connected to upgradeers. And anywhere you had planned or unplanned work, there was an impact on it. Now with this interconnectedness, we are able to, you know, maximum run these upgradeers, just like, you know, conceptually like their refineries where they're connected to multiple sources of feedstock. And I commented on the added the value of every 1% utilization. And so, you know, we will achieve a record high utilization this year, following upon a record high utilization last year. That's money in the bank.

Yeah, I understood. Thanks very much.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Dennis Fong with CIBC. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on obviously a very strong first half. Looking forward to kind of what the second half in 2025 looks like. My first question may be directed maybe towards Peter a little bit more. You've talked a little bit from Shelley as well as in your opening remarks about technology and implementation. I just wanted to run back towards Mine Connect, one of the, I guess, in-house developed pieces of technology that you are using to help track efficiency of the trucks. Can you talk towards maybe some surprises you've seen in terms of the mining fleet efficiency also may be coupled with obviously the addition of these ultra class trucks that you're adding to the field?

Yeah, sure, Dennis. Happy to do that. I think, you know, to start with, you know, it's my belief that transparency of data really drives performance. So with Mine Connect, you know, it's simply a tool that aggregates the data across our sites so we can see how Fort Hills is doing relative to base plant, to sync with the data, to see how the data is being shared, et cetera. And that drives a little bit of internal competitiveness. But it also gets down into the details. And, you know, the key to driving improvements in the upstream in our mining business is really around efficiency and particularly the efficiency of the ultra class hull truck fleet so we can drill down on a shift by shift basis how fast these trucks are operating, you know, how many tons they have on per load, et cetera, et cetera, and even drill down into the individual operator performance. Actually, we shared with Rich last week just an example of a scorecard that we developed for operators in terms of, you know, relative performance, safety performance, truck productivity performance, et cetera. So it sets up that data transparency, internal competitiveness, and a structural way to drive improvements, a targeted way to drive improvements. I think what you're seeing on the OS and G cost that we've demonstrated year to year is really, you know, the starting of the manifestation of our truck strategy, buying those more trucks, driving efficiencies in scale, driving efficiencies in our operations, and really starting to get right sides for the material movements that we have today. So we're going to continue to do that. As Rich said, we've got a bunch more units that are coming in over the remaining six months of this year and into the first quarter of 25. And we're going to continue to drive the efficiencies with the scale of those trucks that we're bringing in.

Great. I appreciate that color there, Peter. Shifting gears to the downstream side, through the quarter, obviously very strong runtime, but also fairly good capture in terms of margin. I was hoping you could provide us a bit of an update in terms of some of the marketing initiatives as well as management of inventory and global marketing crude that you've been implementing, just I guess as Dave has been spending some more time at the company.

Dave isn't here in the room with us today, or I turn it over to him. Chris, do you want to go ahead and comment on that?

Sounds good. Hi, Dennis. Thanks for that. Yeah, I'm going to pinch hit for Dave and put on my old downstream hat on this quarter, but your question is obviously broader than that just in the marketing of crude and I think kind of touches on TMX. But before I go there, I mean, you raised the point that we had market capture of 99% in the quarter. And really when we have that type of market capture, I think it demonstrates the various elements of our downstream business and how we go to market and the underlying strength of the asset. I mean, we had strong utilization, as we noted, particularly Edmonton set a really record, which helps us also with channel mix. And then because of our position both domestically within our branded channels and our export capability, our ability to capture margin across the value chain and we're seeing strength in our branded channels, both retail and wholesale. And then the strength of our logistics and marketing activities are also allowing us to export records amount of distillate to and clear the market. So even though we're running at high utilization and there's, you know, with the distillate long market in Western Canada as an example, we're able to move those barrels and capture that margin. And so that underlines our market, that market capture number. And we're continuing to build on that logistics capability both domestically as well as taking advantage of TMX. You would have heard Dave Falk at the last call about TMX. And when that asset came on, we viewed it as just another great opportunity within our logistics network to expand our reach to different markets. And we don't just take the product to the dock and sell it at the dock. We actually actively market into the end markets themselves and capture the arbitrage. And for that reason, we've taken some positions with some time charters as well. We're really pleased with what we're seeing there. It's definitely adding value and just another demonstration, I think, of, you know, as Rich says, there's integration and there's Suncor integration. And you kind of look at our platform on our downstream business all the way, you know, from that rack all the way through those domestic branded channels where we have, you know, best in class in Canada along with now our reach obviously outside of Canada. And lastly, with inventories, we carefully manage those inventories. We would have had obviously a buildup and a drawdown through Q2 as we prep for the turnarounds. And that was another component to that market capture we saw in the quarter.

Dennis, if I could just add to that a couple of comments. You know, there's a lot of research out there on refined product demand pre-pandemic versus now. And to give you a couple examples, we've mentioned how we've set -to-back refined product sales records for the company. And on gasoline, for example, in North America, kind of the walking around number pre-pandemic, the gasoline demands down about 5% from the second quarter, first half of 19 versus today for the market. We're up 5%. Diesel demand, depending on how you rack it up, is about flat or pre-pandemic to now. We're up 10%. Jet, the still recovering global demand for jet, down a few percent from pre-pandemic. We're on pace for an annual record high. In fact, we're up about 15% from pre-pandemic. And I would attribute these results to kind of three factors. Our strategic relationships, our partnerships, our logistical reach and our understanding of the market and ability to capture opportunities, and then getting right back to the reliability of our base business that provides value to our customers. So we talk a lot about upstream and downstream operational. Our supply and marketing teams are focused like a laser equally on adding value, and I think you see that in the results.

Great. Really appreciate the color from all of you. I'll turn it back.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Yeah, good morning, Rich and team. Very, very strong results. And maybe that's where I want to start, which is the progress that you continue to make on driving down net debt. You're at $9 billion. And so I just love your perspective on how you're tracking towards the $8 billion target. Is middle of next year still the best bogey that you could provide, or is there the potential to pull that forward? And just any perspective around how you see the cadence of deleveraging from here?

Well, I think, Neil, if you step back for a second, kind of take market out of it. Some weeks we're excited about what the market conditions are. Some weeks we're not. But if you kind of strip that out, the operational performance, when we laid out the May 21, kind of the business plan, we said, if you turn the crank, the numbers will spit out the middle of next year. But we are focused on beating that. And I think there was someone on the call said something about, you know, maybe a Christmas present or no better Christmas present than year end. We're looking at all the levers to do that. And many of those levers are just our base performance. And when we put that business plan together that we reviewed, we benchmarked it off of 2023 in all areas, upstream, downstream, volumes, costs. We are performing better than what we showed you on May 21. Now, you know, there's a long way to go. We're certainly not declaring victory. But when I look at that, if market factors aside, that tells me that we're looking at pulling that forward and I'm having increased confidence that those things that we can control, we will be pulling those that bring that net debt target forward. You know, there's still a second half of the year to go. Market plays a big factor in it. But quite pleased with the fundamental performance of the organization on those market factors that we can control that could accelerate hitting that target.

Yeah, thanks, Chris. That's really helpful. And then just to follow up on how you can pull that forward, asset sales become part of the potential mechanism to do that. And then the other swing in the calculation, of course, is how we should be thinking about working capital. So your perspective on those two line items would be great.

You know, I've talked a little bit about asset sales in the past, those things that are kind of core to our integrated strategy and add the most value and those assets that are less core, but they can be quite valuable to us. So we don't talk specifically about anything until we actually have something to talk about. But we continue to look at all of our assets and the value they add to us versus the value they may offer to others. So that could be a part of the timing on achieving net debt. And, you know, Chris, on the working capital, would you like to comment on that? Yeah, for sure.

Hey, Neil. Yeah, I mean, good call out. You know, when we think about the levers for us to be pulling on every dimension of the business, I mean, Rich already mentioned, you know, production costs, sustaining capital. But working capital is obviously a key component of that, too. So you can rest assured that the Suncor team has a laser focus on that as well and just sharply managing that working capital. Like the others, it's a lever in our toolkit to ensure excellent execution of the business. And so we've got our eye on that, too, and its contribution to cash.

Thank you, Chris. Thanks, Rich. You're welcome.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Manav Gupta with UBS. Your line is open.

Good morning, guys. I would like to highlight that this is the second quarter in a row where you have pretty much beaten the street on every important matrix. So congratulations on that. Those things tend to drive very strong re-ratings. My first question to you, sir, is that when I look at -to-date foretales cash costs, it's close to $31 and your guidance is 33 to 36. So first of all, should we expect you to be towards the lower end or beat your guidance? And then as these new trucks arrive, can we see a scenario in 2025 where this cash cost drops closer to $30 or even below it?

You know, I think I appreciate you flagging that on the cost. What we're finding here, you know, the volumetric effect is a huge lever on costs. And so running at the at or above our guidance range upstream and downstream, that is a big part of driving unit costs down. And as I said earlier, we're exceeding our rate of expected improvement on the volume side of it. The area that I had probably the, you know, the biggest question mark and a little bit of the uncertainty on was fundamental cost management, the discipline that it takes to on each and every dollar. And I'm extremely pleased with the organization's response through the first half of the year. Don't declare victory. We've got a long way to go on that. But I think Peter has shared many of the examples with you on improving the mining performance, which is big. Dave's got the same kind of focus on the downstream. So, you know, where we are tracking will be at or better than our cost guidance. And that's, you know, again, we've got five months of the year left, but I think that is a reasonable outlook, a reasonable expectation. Peter, do you have anything else to comment on? Have any costs the biggest bulk of the costs are in your? Yeah, I would

say especially at Fort Halesman Avenue, it is a good call out. We've had some really good months where costs have been better than guidance, of course. But as we look forward for the rest of the year, we're remaining disciplined to our mine improvement plan. We're exactly on track on that. And some of the key activities involve the opening up of the north pit, which will drive higher mining volumes and hence our strategy to employ these larger haul trucks, drive efficiency in our mining operations and maintain our unit mining cost tonnage at or better than where we have been historically. So it's really about driving discipline, making sure that we're staying true to having sufficient mine inventories so that we have sufficient enrichment production out of that facility.

And I'll just add, I think some of the exciting things about particularly in Peter's business, the steps we're taking are very tangible. You know when you convert a truck to autonomous, the costs that are extracted out of that. We know when we bring a new 400 ton haul truck on, the efficiency and the productivity. So these improvements are very tangible. They're independent of oil price, and they're a matter of the sequence and the pace at which we're pursuing. And what I'll tell you is we keep challenging ourselves to can we accelerate the pace of our improvements, the conversion to autonomy, can we accelerate that pace. We're a little bit at the mercy of our OEM manufacturers on the delivery of haul trucks, but we're working hard directly with them on new trucks and shovels because of the tangible nature of the improvement as money in the bank when we capture those. And there's an urgency that Peter has created within his organization that I'm quite proud of because we know it can make our business better, stronger for the long term.

Thank you for a very detailed response. My quick follow-up here is we understand you're not as exposed to the WCAS differential given your refining operations, but we have seen some widening here and trying to understand what's your near to medium-term outlook on the WCAS differential. Obviously, TMX is running, but then you guys and everybody else will also be running much harder in the second half. So trying to understand your outlook for the differential in medium and near term.

Well, you're spot on that our level of integration and the nature of our asset base gives us a lot of resiliency or natural hedge or cushion where we're not nearly as vulnerable as our competitors might be. But Chris, you want to talk a bit about that?

Yeah, sure, absolutely. I mean, obviously with TMX coming on last quarter, it certainly provides a structural help to the WCAS differential as that additional egress is now available to the basin. That said, I mean, you're still going to see that light-heavy differential, you know, move around a little bit depending on what's going on in the market. And, you know, we saw it come in when the line came on. We all expected that. And trading down kind of low teens, it's since widened out, but that was a bunch of other factors. There was refinery outages and pad two through that period of time. There was a big drawdown in inventories out of hardesty, so there was more product going to market. We saw a little bit of weakness in pricing at the Gulf Coast. Those things factored into the differential widening out a bit. But, you know, our view is that we're going to continue to see that light-heavy differential be supported in the low to mid teens. Will it get a bit higher now and then because of market factors? We can absolutely expect that. But it should be far more structurally supported than we would have seen a number of years ago when we would see big volatility and see blowouts in that light-heavy differential. But I think, you know, the main underlining point to all that is the one Rich just made. And just with our integrated business model all the way from Richmond production through upgrading through our downstream business refining and then on to the customer, we're largely insulated from that type of volatility.

Thank you so much.

Thanks. Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Roger Reed with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Yeah, thanks. Good morning. I think maybe just to come back on the cost structure here, you know, obviously real good performance in the second quarter. I was just wondering, is there anything in it that was one time in nature or a timing factor? What I'm really trying to understand is what's the new baseline of costs that we should think about, maybe how you're measuring that and how you plan to, you know, let's call it maintain that for the rest of the year, lower it over time.

Yeah, Roger, this is Rich. There were no one time any events or things. I think the biggest thing I'd say is we took a restructuring charge in the second quarter of last year. I believe the number, if somebody can keep me honest, $275 million. And what I said in my comments is that year on year, we're in absolute dollars, we're $270 million less than we were in the first half. So when you take out that restructuring charge, we're basically flat in absolute costs despite the much, much higher volumes across the board. So I think the, you know, that's that operating leverage we talked about. And so going forward basis, you know, that's today's Suncorps. That is the focus we're bringing and expected to continue with higher reliability. You get the higher volumes. It drives down the unit costs with the discipline, with the actions that Peter has described in the upstream. Dave has similar in the downstream to keep the cap on costs. I mean, that's who we are. Another way I'd offer you to look at it just is kind of an interesting way. We added the remaining interest at Fort Hills this year and we've offset inflationary pressures, which there are throughout our business. We did all that for free. We offset inflation, added Fort Hills barrels at no higher cost. Again, it keeps coming back to the phrase I use is operating leverage. And I think that is the, you know, the thing I would say that I'm particularly continue to be pleased with is the level of focus within the organization on the goals, the objectives, what's important. And when you create focus with 15,000 plus people, you can get results. And that's exactly what you're seeing. And I see no reason that won't continue.

No, it's definitely an impressive performance. That's why I was just, you know, I want to make sure I can start thinking about it as this is the level as opposed to, you know, just a good quarter. If I were you,

that's the way I would start thinking of it.

Okay, great. And then the last question I had, just what's the right way in terms of share repurchases? You've hit the debt targets. So we can just reiterate for us where we should see that shake out on a quarterly basis.

Yeah, sure, Roger. We laid that out. This is Chris. We laid that out at the May 21st update. So we've moved to a 75% share buyback, 25% debt reduction allocation of excess refunds flow. Once we get to the $8 billion net debt target, which we talked about on May 21st earlier on this call, then we're going to move ourselves to 100% shareholder return allocation.

And is there a, I guess again, kind of getting back to Neil's question earlier about working capital, I mean, assume that on an annual basis and then make the adjustments on a quarterly basis.

Yeah, that's exactly right. That's the way I think about it.

Okay, thank you. Yeah.

Thank you. We have one moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Menno Hulshoff with TD Cowan. Your line is open.

Thanks and good morning, everyone. I'll start with a question on the strong beat on production. Rich, you provided a lot of detailing or prepared remarks, but could you maybe loosely quantify how much production uplifts you got from faster than expected completion of turnarounds versus pure outperformance of the assets? And then I guess the follow-up to that, and this is more a point of confirmation, but was there any maintenance activity deferred in the quarter? And if so, what was the thinking behind that?

Yeah, you know, take that in reverse. We did everything in the quarter we had planned to do in our business plan. So there were no deferrals and things. So I commented on the upstream that we had 12 additional kind of days. They weren't full days because they were parts of the assets. So, for example, you know, Syncrude had a relative plan, seven days of additional 8-3 Coker runtime. Other things that what I would say is Peter's team, to my pleasant surprise, as they looked at the turnaround work, said, all right, what else can we do elsewhere across the asset base to offset that? So we were probably, what, maybe, Peter, 30,000 barrels a day or so higher than what we might have thought, that our internal plan would have been?

Yeah, I think that's a fair assessment. And again, it comes back to looking at this as an integrated production system. So we're moving, you know, sour barrels, some base plant to Syncrude to take advantage of some high-detreating capacity that we have there. We're looking to, as Shelley said, really minimize the scope and execute within a well-defined window and set ambitious targets for the team that they, you know, frankly, were able to achieve this year. So it's kind of a, we're pulling all the levers here to get the maximum value that we possibly can. And

I think, you know, Mel, I think one of the things that it comes back to on me, and I mentioned we were at Fort Hills last week, Firebag a few weeks earlier, is the potential of the organization. I don't think we could sit here on the phone today and tell you we fully understand the full potential yet because the organization continues to exceed what we think are challenging expectations. And that is a lot of fun. And you see that energy and enthusiasm. I use some of the examples at Firebag in terms of adding or de-bottlenecking at low or no cost. You're seeing that across the upstream and downstream. And I don't know if we'll continue to beat like we, you know, did on this quarter, but I continue to be pleasantly surprised at the organization's ability to creatively find ways to exceed expectations, and that makes for a lot of fun.

Terrific. And maybe I'll just sort of continue along the, sort of continue the conversation on the turnaround side of things. Rich, you mentioned extended intervals between the turnarounds as one of the next potential focus areas. What is your best guess on what that could look like and which assets are most likely to benefit first?

I think it comes in two areas. This is kind of building off of Shelley's comments. As we look at individual pieces of equipment, you may have a turnaround at an upstream or downstream facility, but component parts of that turnaround we may look at. And instead of doing a three-year interval, we may convince ourselves that we have sufficient information to go five-year interval on component parts. So that would shorten the overall duration of a turnaround, but we might still have a turnaround at that facility every so often. So that's part of it. The bigger opportunity is if we can just simply extend the intervals on entire turnarounds. I think that's a bigger question for us right now, but I think the prize, if we get into it, and I'll go back to the May 21st deck, where we had kind of the target of the capital cost reduction that we believe we can achieve as we go from third and fourth quartile in turnarounds to first and second quartile, that continues to be kind of the right magnitude of the prize. The added benefits that we're still quantifying is as we have more days on production, what is that benefit? And that I think is a further upside to what we've shown in the May 21st deck. Shelly, do you have any other, or Peter, do you have any other comments on that? Peter, I saw you raise your hand there. And we've

got a couple of specific examples, Meadow, and we're really looking across the entire upgrading base, and we're guided by Solomon. So our strategies are rooted in benchmarking on where there are clear opportunities. You know, there's some good examples of SYNCRUDE at looking at decoupling the units, at looking at extending turnaround units, or turnaround intervals, so like back tower from three years to six years, the resilient recovery units from four years to six years, higher treers three years to six years. So we have very specific plans that are asset by asset, informed by Solomon, and a similar thing at base plant. So I still think there's lots of opportunity in the turnaround space that we're going after. So there are some of these, given the intervals and the cycles, will take some time to play out in the coming years. But rest assured, our engineering teams and the site teams are really laser-focused on making a big difference here. And the end result is, in more uptime, improved safety, improved reliability, and improved turnaround efficiency, which is a bottom-line free funds flow increase.

Just to comment on that, we've talked in the past about how we had gotten a bit lax on benchmarking. Today's SYNCRUDE is all about benchmarking. We want to know who the best of the best is, why they're better than us, and then what we can do to then close that gap and then exceed that performance. So I mentioned before that we had not participated in the most recent Solomon survey or two, Solomon the Holy Grail on plant benchmarking. I'm not getting any commission for plugging Solomon on this. But Shelley and Dave reached out and said, you know, the next survey is next year. That's too long for us. We want to get in and get the most recent update of where we benchmark. And Solomon did that for us. And we had their president and their leadership team here with us, what, two weeks ago? And we sat down one afternoon going item by item across our business, where we have room for improvement. I think now as we take that back into our broader plans and individual facilities, I think we're going to find and identify areas to improve even beyond what our kind of our initial expectations have been.

I appreciate the thoughts. I'll turn it back.

Thank you. That concludes today's question and answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Troy Little for any closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for joining our call this morning. If you have any follow-up questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to our team. Operator, you can end the call.

This concludes today's program. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.